Case Study Carol Fern

Words: 808
Pages: 4

Brainbridge Borough employed Carol Fern as a tax clerk for 18 years. Her position is a part of the bargaining unit that is represented to by Local 10 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. Carol had as of late adopted a child and asked for a six month unpaid maternity leave after she came back from her two week paid vacation. Her manager had denied her maternity leave since it was not a characteristic birth, but rather they offered her two back-to-back 90-day rational leave. Carol and the union petitioned for a grievance in light of Article X, area 4.A-Unpaid Leaves, 5. Maternity, page 13. They showed that the organization had damaged the aggregate dealing agreement by denying her maternity clear out.
Brainbridge Borough As
…show more content…
It is evidently noted in Article X, segment 4.A-Unpaid Leave, 5. Maternity Leave on page 13 of the of the last agreement between the business and the union that maternity leave demands that it don't surpass over a half year ought to be conceded. Carol Fern appeal was inside parameters and ought to have been conceded her maternity time off. Despite the fact that the committee had allowed Carol Fern two continuous 90-days rational reason leave, Carols Fern feels she is qualifies for the class of maternity leave as opposed to a rational reason time off. As the lawyer speaking to the association and Carol Fern, we have arrived at a conclusion that she was victimized because of the reality she was denied maternity leave to watch over a adopted child. The term maternity leave does not really mean the mother needs to conceive or normally conceive an offspring. Therefore, Brainbridge Borough should concede Carol Fern her maternity leave as per the collective bargaining