It’s easy to say that before electronics, people weren’t as exposed to endless gossip about celebrities. However, society today, we get harassed with information about who is dating whom, where they hang out from these gossip filled magazines such as People,Vogue, and Entertainment Weekly. As the new generation stands strong with the ideas of improved technology, we’ve momentarily forgotten that celebrities are human beings too. Whatever happened to your own personal thoughts and ideas? How would you feel if you were objectified by the media or the countless number of people that look up to you judging your every move? Having said that, if anyone wants to share his/her personal experience or private thoughts with the world, there is no censorship…show more content… Very few implicit applicants will have entirely immaculate private lives, free from embarrassing improprieties committed while young. The vantage point of the dreadful and unforgiving press examination will thus discourage many from seeking public office and refute their aptitude to the public good.People are risking everything that they have in order to come forward towards situation of trust.(Brady)Those who do offer themselves for selection or court will therefore tend to be deviant characters of a straitlaced nature whose perspective on family and drugs may be skewed and intolerant as a result. The right for seclusion shouldn’t come into play if the card that was pulled was the person being forced to share about their lives lives. (Mcdougall)When personal ethics and family life is intentional and specifically used by a politician as a rationale to get them favored, then they have chosen to make it a publicized issue rather than a hushed one. This by itself doesn’t justify intrusion into the secludedness of those politicians who don’t flaunt their personal lives as a campaigning
