Cesar Chavez Pathos Analysis

Words: 604
Pages: 3

Violence and revolt! No, sorry, that’s not good for the people or society. Labor union organizer and civil rights leader, Cesar Chavez, wrote an article about the importance of nonviolence resistance when it comes to civil rights. He uses ethos to give people the sense that he is an authority, and to help people to understand his side of the argument. He also uses pathos to appeal to people’s human nature, and their sense of humanity. Cesar Chavez uses ethos to tell people that violence is what overly emotional people do, and that nonviolence really rattles the opposing side’s chains. As Chavez states, “Those who espouse violence exploit people. To call men to arms without many promises, to ask them to give up their lives for a cause and then not …show more content…
Cesar Chavez states, “If we resort to violence then one of two things will happen: either the violence will be escalated and then will be many injuries and perhaps death on both sides, or there will be total demoralization of the workers.” (CHAVEZ line 17) Chavez basically says that when people want to protect something, they become emotional. He’s also saying that you can better protect the people or things you love, you must not become over-emotional, and stick with nonviolence. When people become emotional, they become angry, frustrated, and hurt, and this makes them resort to violence. By using nonviolence, he says you can protect the ones you love and not hurt the loved ones of others, innocent or otherwise. Nonviolence results in a lower death toll overall than violence, and this is one of the aims of nonviolent resistance. Death and destruction isn’t the only thing that can be spawned from violence though, the workers can be demoralized. Neither injuries and death nor demoralization is something you want. Chavez appeals to these emotions in people, and people normally respond well to the thought of people not