Citizens United Case

Words: 1447
Pages: 6
Open Document
Citizens United Vs. Federal Election Commission
The legal system has been developing over many years. During each year there are cases that occur which make large impacts on today's world. In the United States, we have three different types of courts. The district court has jurisdiction over cases that include civil and criminal actions. Appeal courts settle cases in which both parties are unsatisfied with district court ruling and the Supreme Court is the highest of them all. The Supreme Court receives cases from the lower courts that have not been resolved. Cases that make it to the supreme court tend to make a big impact on today and sometimes change laws or encourage the government to make a new law. An example of a case that made it to …show more content…
This case was developed from the dissatisfaction of citizens united with the federal election commission in the district court of Columbia. Citizens united's goal from the case was to prevent the application of the bipartisan campaign reform act on their production Hillary: The Movie. The bipartisan campaign reform act restricted national political parties, federal candidates, and office holders from receiving soft money in federal elections. Soft money is classified as funds given from others that are not regulated by the campaign finance law. Having outside resources enlarges the candidate's campaign party. Hillary: The Movie was being used to express why Hillary Clinton should be a candidate for the United States President. The promotion from this movie would persuade large companies to support her which would give her "big money" for her campaign. This was not prohibited by section 203 of the BCRA. Section 203 of the reform act states that corporations and labor unions cannot fund campaigns, making the movie against the …show more content…
In the first amendment, citizens are given the right to have freedom of religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. With section 203 of the BCRA restricting one's rights to express their opinion on Hilary Clinton's ability to be president, United Nations felt that the reform act was unconstitutional. Although this may look to be true it was found that the section 203 was not unconstitutional. The reason being is that it was found constitutional in the McConnell versus federal election commission case. The element from the production that may have been unconstitutional was that the donors who were funding the movie was not being disclosed, which does not comply with section 203. The question of who the donors are were not factored into this case because the initial argument was about the movie. The movie by itself was not unconstitutional being that it was equivalent to expression advocacy and the outcome of the movie was not what it was thought to be. When one thinks of the movie being a part of a campaign it is automatically assumed that it will speak high of the candidate, but this movie actually ended up doing the opposite. With that, the section 203 was not violated when applied to the movie only. If United Nations were to create an argument about which donors were funding the movie the results may have been different. Since the district court denied the injunction an
Show More

Related Documents: Citizens United Case

Citizens United Vs Fec Case Study

The citizens united v. FEC is a supreme court case on January 21st 2010. The case argued that BRCA was limiting our first amendment right for freedom of speech due to the fact they are stopping corporations and unions from supporting politicians . This decision let unions and corporations use general funds to support candidates running for office. Some believe that this ruling allows politicians and government officials to be bought while others think the politicians taking these funds will work…

Words 625 - Pages 3

Citizens United Vs Fec Case Study

Citizens United v. FEC is a United States 2010 constitutional law case which is concerned with the limits which the First Amendment imposes on the government to regulate political spending by nonprofit corporations. It was found by the Supreme Court that legislation which prohibits political expenditures by corporations is unconstitutional, in violation with the First Amendment. The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, which Justice Kennedy argued includes not only individuals, but also associations…

Words 964 - Pages 4

Citizens United V. F. Ec Case Summary

The United States Supreme Court’s recent ruling on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (Citizens v. F.E.C.), has been one of the most controversial decisions in the history of the Court. At the heart of this case is the interpretation of the First Amendment. Therefore it is not surprising to see the level of the public’s interest in this influential decision. The potential impact that Citizens v. F.E.C. decision could have on the citizens, and corporations in America is astounding therefore…

Words 643 - Pages 3

Case Study: Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission

One duty of the FEC includes overseeing disclosure of campaign finance information and public funding of presidential elections and enforcing contribution limits. An example of this task can be found during the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) which overturned part of the 2002 law that had prohibited corporate and union funding of campaign ads. The Federal Election Campaign can enforce its finance laws through The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 which states Political…

Words 618 - Pages 3

Essay on CITIZENS UNITED

Geroux April 16, 2014 Citizens United The Judicial Branch is a branch of the government that is separate and independent, but also has checks and balances to make sure other branches as well as their own are staying in line. Within this branch there is the Supreme Court consisting of nine members, one Chief Justice and eight associate justices, whose power is judgment. All judges are appointed for life and have original and appellate jurisdiction, but majority of the cases they try are appellate-meaning…

Words 1836 - Pages 8

Case Study: Korematsu V. United States

is a United States Supreme Court case that experienced a unanimous decision that ended state segregation. The case brought the beginning of the American civil rights movement. BvBoE had a 9-0 vote to end federal tolerance of segregation and “separate but equal” ways, the case declared that “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.” BvBoE came back to the Fourteenth Amendment which states that there is equal protection under law to all citizens. The Supreme Court ruled the case as a…

Words 881 - Pages 4

Immigration: United States V. Wong Kim Ark

from Europe into what is now called the United States. The first colonists came for wealth and to seek independence from the British Monarchy. "The first permanent English colony was Jamestown, Virginia. It was founded…

Words 1754 - Pages 8

Constitution Guideline Essay

imposts or duties on imports or exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing its inspection laws; and the net produce of all duties and imposts, laid by any state on imports or exports, shall be for the use of the thesauri of the United states; and all such laws shall be subject to the revision and control of the congress. 3.No state shall, without the consent of congress, lay any duty of tonnage, keep troops, of ships of war in time of peace, enter into any agreement or compact…

Words 1798 - Pages 8

Dred Scott Case Analysis

rulings established by previous court cases and various federal laws, the enslavement of Dred Scott cannot be justified. Court cases such as Prigg v. Pennsylvania and Winny v. Whitesides emphasize the importance of the recognition of slaves as free citizens after they are brought into anti-slavery territories. Not only do these court cases support Dred Scott’s innocence and freedom, but the subsequent laws also further enforce the idea that Scott is a citizen. The Northwest Ordinance, Mason-Dixon…

Words 927 - Pages 4

Supreme Court Controversy

The United States Supreme Court is one of the branches of the United States government which was established by the United States constitution. The court was established by the Judiciary Act of 1789.The United States constitution under Article III further states the powers of the Supreme Court. Over the years, however, many critics have felt that the U.S Supreme Court have overstepped its mandate by hearing and even determining cases that do not fall under its jurisdiction. The court’s jurisdiction…

Words 252 - Pages 2