Citizens United Vs Fec Case Study

Citizens United v. FEC is a United States 2010 constitutional law case which is concerned with the limits which the First Amendment imposes on the government to regulate political spending by nonprofit corporations. It was found by the Supreme Court that legislation which prohibits political expenditures by corporations is unconstitutional, in violation with the First Amendment. The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, which Justice Kennedy argued includes not only individuals, but also associations of individuals (Citizens United 2010). This would logically include corporations. This court case has large ramifications for the electoral process at the state and federal level, substantially in which candidates run for election by gaining backing from …show more content…
Their movie, Hillary: The Movie, would be in violation of some provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, which was intended to regulate the influence of “big money” on “electioneering communications” (Lindbloom & Terranova 2010). As a consequence, the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was brought forward to challenge this prohibition on “electioneering communications” by independent, privately-funded nonprofit corporations. Implicated in the decision would be not only how and whether political expenditures by nonprofit corporations would be regulated, but how political expenditure by any similar, privately funded association, such as a for-profit or labor union would be regulated (McElroy 2010). Indeed, the impact could be so extensive that it could pave the way for political expenditures made, in effect, by foreign corporations (Gerstein

Show More

Related Documents: Citizens United Vs Fec Case Study

Citizens United Vs Fec Case Study

Essay on AP Government and Politics