Civil Disobedience Gandhi And Mandela Comparison

Words: 582
Pages: 3

The thing that Thoreau, Gandhi, and Mandela had in common is that they all believe that civil disobedience is an effective way of change government, they had served time in prison for civil disobedience, and all their legacies have impact on the terms they had on civil rights and equality. Also, they have inspired may people up until today for the great work they did, and a lot of the people admired them. They have done amazing things for their country and mainly for their people so that they would have a better lifestyle. Henry David Thoreau thought the war was wrong. He refused to pay taxes to the American government because of it. He once said, "Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves." Thoreau did not follow anybody he follows his conscience rather that the law and because of that he was in jail. He used to write everything he saw that would make the world better. He fought for his beliefs and the beliefs of the people. He also argued that the government should have less power because they could do what they wanted, and they never listened to the people. …show more content…
He once said, " The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong." In India, his peaceful leadership encouraged the Indian people to protest until their country won its independence from British rule. Gandhi was best known for Indian nationalist leader, he was the one who did the "Salt March" to demonstrate that he was against the British rule of India. He went against the British rule but used non-violence resistance to injustice the "Salt March" in 1930. He and the people that were with him that agreed on all what Gandhi said marched all the way to the Arabian and defied by extracting salt from the seawater. Gandhi was arrested 12 times for all the things he did and for the protests he made. He was later assassinated for no