larger breakdown in this classroom was in her
spectators, who failed to engage with and challenge her provocative ideas.
They were not a community in that room, but individuals, writing separate
papers, to be read by a single authority, for separate grades. Frequent peer
review had done nothing to alter that. This was “student-centered” to the
point of narcissistic obsession.
The lack of critical thinking in the individual and of a critical response
in the classroom were due to the passive/absorptive…
Words 6678 - Pages 27
