Coach Autonomy Support In Soccer

Words: 1344
Pages: 6

METHODS The participants that were used for the study were children from 12 to 15 years old. There were 142 kids; 106 were female and 36 were male. The mean and standard deviation of the kids playing on community based youth soccer teams was 13.38 and .97, respectively. The mean and standard deviation for the kids who had been playing soccer was for 7.42 years and 2.4, respectively. The average and standard deviation for them playing on their current team is 2.59 years and 2.05, respectively and have also been with their current coach for 2.5 years and 1.80, respectively. About 83.8% of the kids were Caucasian, about 4.9% were Multiracial, about 3.5% were Latino, about 2.1% African American, about 1.4 % were Asian or an Islander, and lastly …show more content…
The measures of Coach Autonomy Support in the questionnaire used examples like, “I feel that my soccer coach provides me with choices and options (Reynolds & McDonough, 2015)”. These fifteen questions were also rated within a 7-point scale; 1 meaning strongly disagree and 7 meaning they strongly agree. The measures of Coach Involvement in the questionnaire were relationship based and had examples like, “To what extent could you turn to your coach for advice about problems? (Reynolds & McDonough, 2015)”. These five questions were rated on a 4-point scale; 1 meaning not at all and 4 meaning very much. The measure in Need Satisfaction was split into 3 sections, first being a five question division of competence in the intrinsic motivation and this helped distinguish there was a greater or a smaller competence need for satisfaction. The participants had to rate the questions on a 7-point scale; 1 meaning they totally disagree and 7 meaning the totally agree. An example of these types of question is, “I think I am pretty good at soccer (Reynolds & McDonough, 2015)”. The second section was five questions on a division of acceptance, which was the need of relatedness, and an example of these questions is, “On this soccer team, I feel …show more content…
There was a lot of consistency with the variable and results, but we did learn when having a more autonomy supportive coach positively made intrinsic motivation with an indirect connection, but also made a positive direct connection with intrinsic motivation when the coach’s involvement was more moderate to high.
When having a more autonomy supportive coach it anticipated identified regulation in a positive way when the coach’s insolvent was high. With the introjected regulation, there was no correlation or positive or negative indicators. On the other hand, external regulation was positively seen indirectly because of the need of satisfaction with an autonomy supportive coach.
When it came to the need of satisfaction, the effect of autonomy support on amotivation was negative and was found to be no help whatsoever. With intrinsic motivation and identified regulation, there was a positive coach autonomy effect especially when the coach’s level of involvement was moderate to high. All youth athletes would dedicate their time and energy to understanding the sport and will have a very positive, beneficial intrinsic concentration in the sport because they are motivated to achieve any kind of goal if the coaches can express and communicate their emotional support for the athletes