Compare And Contrast Arthur Book And Movie

Words: 383
Pages: 2

I think Arthur in the movie is better than a book. I can understand better, it shows how Arthur is braver than a book, can see their feelings more specifically and it is not boring. The movie shows Arthur's real life and personality. Involve his arduous effort. Also, his powerful knights and army. I have three reasons why I think Arthur in the movie is better than a book.
First, I can understand the story better. The acting makes me understand clearly, while the Saxsons irritate Arthur. Also, it was more vivid than a book. The sound and voice, acting makes understanding Arthur well. Furthermore, I could know the personality of each character. For example, Arthur is taking on a different faces in every work. King Arthur has many faces he is shown to be kind, wise and generous on one hand. Guinevere is also wise. She is one of the most popular queens in Aurthurian legend. The movie show how she was wise and intelligent. It shows Other knight's courage too.
…show more content…
It shows specifically that he was brave. It shows the war between Saxons and Arthur, He had a lot of courage to fight with the Saxons. Also, he was brave when he tries to escape Guinevere. For example, think if Arthur was not brave or weak, maybe he couldn't save, escape Guinevere. Movie shows directly about this.
Lastly, i can see Aurthur's feeling accurately. And it is not boring. There are many scenes why I think like this. When he cries because one of the knight is dead, it was awesome and it was detail acting. Next, their expression was certainly correct. Like, crying, annoying, angry, mad, crazy. Further more, I could know more about the Saxons. If I only read a book, I couldn't realize who is the Saxons and how are they bad, how are they enemy with