Comparing 'Sixteen And Through The Passage'

Words: 989
Pages: 4

In the stories "Sixteen" and "Through the Passage" both creators use a topic of characters needing to substantiate themselves to somebody. Then again, the distinctions of these two stories gets to be obvious when who the characters are attempting to substantiate themselves to. In "Sixteen" the primary character is by all accounts endeavoring to substantiate herself to the pursuer, that she is sufficiently shrewd and sufficiently famous to be telling this story. Be that as it may, in "Through the Passage" Jerry tries to substantiate himself to the outside young men he gazes up to furthermore to himself.

All through every story, the characters attempt to prove something to themselves or other people. In Maureen Daly's short story "Sixteen" the storyteller is obviously attempting to prove to the pursuer that she is shrewd and famous. An
…show more content…
Daly keeps in touch with, "I mean, I need you to comprehend from the earliest starting point that I'm not by any stretch of the imagination so stupid. I recognize what a young woman ought to do and what she shouldn't. I get around." When she says, "I need you to comprehend," she is plainly coordinating the announcement at us, the pursuer. As she goes ahead to say that she is not so much that imbecile, her message plainly turns into an attempt to persuade us that she is keen. At long last, when she says, "I get around," it shows up as if she is attempting to tell the pursuer that she is prevalent. Joining what has recently been gained from the storyteller's announcements, She is attempting to prove to somebody her ethos: that she is sufficiently keen and sufficiently famous to be letting us know an anecdote around a kid.

In Doris Lessing's short story "Through the Passage" the principal character named Jerry meets a gathering