Comparison Between Leonardo Da Vinci's Last Supper And Michelangelo

Words: 1252
Pages: 6

In the middle of the Renaissance, artists like Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo Buonarroti establish the characteristics of the High Renaissance. The formation of the High Renaissance signals the level of success of the era from an art historical point of view. At the same time this noted the return of the Medici to power in Florence. This new era marked anew for artists as they abandoned simplification and began using more styles leading towards mannerism. Additionally, artists, established different styles forming new ideas in comparison to earlier Renaissance artworks. This reduces to the subjects of an artist’s interpretation of iconographic material, technique and the patrons to mark this change. However, the High Renaissance artists do display likenesses and distinctions. The best works of this time frame are Leonardo da Vinci’s Last Supper and Michelangelo Buonarroti’s Creation of Adam due to their …show more content…
The use of mathematical perspective and shape within da Vinci’s and Buonarroti’s work is what mostly distinguishes the High Renaissance from earlier Italian Renaissance art. Specifically, Leonardo da Vinci’s Last Supper and Michelangelo Buonarroti’s Creation of Adam characterize best the High Renaissance style because of their styles, they created the concepts, images, and techniques fro the next generation to use and in doing so, they set the standards for the next era in art history. Understanding both artists the important thing to realize is the artists are similar and different by style, ideology, and personality. Their similarities is what ties the High Renaissance into a great time of achievement as they display humanism, religious scenes and continue to display new ideals such as sfumato, perspective, mannerism and cangiantismo. Furthermore, their differences separates the two successful artists from earlier Italian Renaissance