Comparison Of Andrew Jackson And The Tariff Of Abominations

Words: 1252
Pages: 6

One day a 13 year old boy was captured by the British during the American Revolution. The boy refused to polish one of the British soldier’s boots, so the soldier slashed the boy in the face with a sword. This boy grew up to become Andrew Jackson. He was tough then and stayed tough throughout his presidency. Jackson was the founder of the first modern day Democratic Party, destroyed the second bank of the United States, but most importantly ceased the splitting of our country. Andrew Jackson’s toughness was put to the test when South Carolina rejected a federal mandate. Jackson took a stand against South Carolina when they refused to follow a federal tariff, The Tariff of 1832.
There was not much similarity when it came to the North’s and the
…show more content…
In 1828, “The tariff sought to protect northern and western agricultural products from competition with foreign imports; however the resulting tax on foreign goods would raise the cost of living in the South and would cut into the profits of New England’s industrialists” (History, Arts, and Archives). It was named the “Tariff of Abominations” by the Southern states because they felt that it was destroying their economy. The North on the contrary was more than pleased with the tariff because this meant they would be making an abundant amount of …show more content…
He was raised by his mother, until she died when he was 14. After her passing, both his brothers died in the American Revolution. Then, he was raised by two uncles. Andrew Jackson, a lawyer and a landowner, became the national war hero after defeating the British in New Orleans during the War of 1812. He was later nominated to become president in 1828, and won against John Calhoun. (Andrew Jackson - 7th President of the United States)
Andrew Jackson did not agree with the nullification. Therefore, “In his address, Jackson showed that the doctrine of nullification was "incompatible with the existence of the Union, contradicted expressly by the letter of the Constitution, unauthorized by its spirit, inconsistent with every principle on which It was founded, and destructive of the great object for which it was formed."(President Jackson Responds to Nullification) He then took charge against South Carolina and it’s Vice