comparison paper

Submitted By sdennis2
Words: 3956
Pages: 16

Organizational Design Paper
Facilitator:

An organizational design can be defined as a process which improves the chance that an organization will or can be successful. It is a formal, step by step process that brings together aspects of an organization like the staff (workers) within the organization and new technology that helps to facilitate good quality care. Usually, design is approached as an internal change under the guidance of an external facilitator. Managers and members work together to define the needs of the organization then create systems to meet those needs most effectively. The facilitator assures that a systematic process is followed and encourages creative thinking (Coleman, 2013). In the following paragraphs, I will attempt to analyze the design of my organization and describe the internal and external factors that have defined and shaped my organization. There have been many different organizations that have been influenced by a type of command and control structure. Most organizations today are designed just like the government, in which the authority and responsibility are arranged into systems where people are ranked high in importance, one above the other. Within this type of organization, the rules and policies are evenly applied to different departments to promote control over its employees’ mannerisms (Suchman, 2013). The workload is organized within different departments. Employees’ perform special functions such as patient care, satisfaction, and education. People who perform similar tasks are usually grouped together. My facility is divided into departments, each providing the appropriate patient care for that area. I work in the Emergency Department, and we provide emergency care services. It is not necessarily designed to provide long term care. However, people treat it as their doctor’s office. In my department we all work together to provide good patient care and education in an attempt to promote patient satisfaction. This is a common strategy found there. The basic organizational form that I described, can be appropriate for any organization, whether it is a government, school or business (Cole, 2013). This form can be familiar, predictable yet rational. Even though certain functions in an organization can seem distinguishable and detectable, each organization can attempt to apply these same guidelines to their own situations. Afterwards, organizations may want to study the results of how their systems are affected. Secondly, organizations must study their staff. Staff members are quite different and no two are exactly the same. This in turn, affects tremendously, how a system is organized. If an area or system wants to achieve certain results, they must choose the route of organization that is best for them. In the Emergency Department where I work, the same methods that are used there may not be as effective in other areas. I believe that the certain techniques, for example, that we do use in the Emergency Department can be fine tuned to fit the other departments found in the organization so that it becomes their own style. No two areas or departments may necessarily respond in the same way, however. The purpose for each group should be the guideline set in order for organizations to become successful in their own right. I believe that it is ok for different departments or areas to use the same methods of achieving their goals only if they want the same results as the other department. Sometimes the opposite of the desired results can be received. In my Emergency Department, the goal is to improve patient satisfaction scores in hope of the patient returning or choosing to return to the health care facility in the future. Other areas of the facility may have their own purposes and should be managed according to their own purpose, if that is the case. Everyone should strive to provide fast, effective, good quality health care and services to their…