Comstock Law Case Analysis

Words: 830
Pages: 4

Due to the great deal of knowledge offered in this text, there are at least five takeaways I have found from reading this.The first is about Margaret Sanger. Margaret Sanger, a nurse and an activist for birth control, grew up in a large family. In turn, she saw the effects of endless child care and repeated pregnancies and births. Her mother died at the age of 48 due to these complications, and she grew up a town with several families who had to deal with these same circumstances. As Margaret began her nursing career, she saw the effects childbearing had on women, especially the poor. She began to understand that without a means of terminating pregnancies, women ended up unable to fight off sickness due to weakened immune systems and bodies as a whole, leaving them vulnerable to death. I was shocked to know that the Comstock Law was essentially ruining the lives of poor families.

The second of these takeaways is about the dreaded Comstock law. I learned that the Comstock Law was created by Anthony Comstock, and that it was signed in 1873 by Ulysses S. Grant. It’s title was the Act for the Suppression of Trade in and Circulation of Obscene Literature and Articles of
…show more content…
Robert P. Casey, the aforementioned Governor, became involved in the Court Case Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. The Casey opinion began by stating that Roe v. Wade was indeed protected by the Constitution, and concluded by saying “A decision to overrule Roe’s essential holding under the existing circumstances would… be at the cost of both profound and unnecessary damage to the Court’s legitimacy, and to the Nation’s commitment to the rule of law. It is therefore imperative to adhere to the essence of Roe’s original decision, and we do so today.”. The Casey case basically saved Roe v. Wade from conquest, and Roe v. Wade survived the several attacks countless groups made against Roe’s