As a consequentialist, Mr. Smith bases his moral decisions on its consequences. Abortion, he claims, does more good than harm, and is morally permissible (even encouraged). Mr. Smith holds a pro-choice stance; he argues that outlawing abortion has extremely damaging consequences on society, and produces more misery than safe and legal abortion.
Achieving equal participation of women in society is important, and though we have made immense progress in this regard, depriving women of their reproductive rights is a massive hindrance. Violating women’s rights leads to …show more content…
Pro-choice consequentialists claim that outlawing abortion would be detrimental for society in various ways. Mr. Adams, a deontologist, responded to this claim by stating that the unborn child has a right to life, and that abortion would be a breach of those rights. Finally, Ms. White introduced us to a virtue ethics approach, and claimed that the decision to proceed with abortion depends on good or virtuous character, and is made through a case-by-case analysis. There will never be universal and broadly accepted views on abortion, as opinions, such as those demonstrated above, vary