Constitutional Convention Vs Antifederalist

Words: 683

Pages: 3

Open Document

If there were to be a convention to revise the present day constitution, and if the body departed from its stated purpose as radically as the delegates did in 1787 I do not believe it would be successful in establishing a new document like the constitutional convention was. In this case a federalist would be for the change of the constitution and an antifederalist would be against the change. In the position of an antifederalist, one who opposes the changing of the constitution, I would state that this change would take away our bill of rights, the whole structure of the government as we know it would dissipate, and we would have no order because our rulers would have no power. If the constitution were to be struck out, the bill of rights would also go with it. If the bill of rights were to be taken away there would be riots and chaos I believe, because the people feel unsafe without their rights in place to protect them. As we have seen in the recent news with police officers being labeled as “brutal” for neglecting people’s rights and causing harm to them, this has caused an abundance of rioting and looting in various cities, …show more content…
The states money and laws would be unknown. The people would have no structure as how to live in a country with no solid government, even for the duration of another document being written. Also, the United States has millions of people, this isn’t like changing things for thirteen states, but for fifty states, which would be a difficult task. Also the businesses/ organizations that are receiving federal funding would be shut down until the new form of government is established. Even if a new document were to be formed before the dismemberment of the constitution I am convinced that it would be very difficult for the nation as a whole to adjust to such a

Constitutional Convention Vs Antifederalist

If there were to be a convention to revise the present day constitution, and if the body departed from its stated purpose as radically as the delegates did in 1787 I do not believe it would be successful in establishing a new document like the constitutional convention was. In this case a federalist would be for the change of the constitution and an antifederalist would be against the change. In the position of an antifederalist, one who opposes the changing of the constitution, I would state that…

Words 683 - Pages 3

United States Constitution and Political Parties Essay

is Government?  We need government to protect the rights of the people.  In America we have a Republican form of government – The people elect leaders to make laws and vote on decisions for them  In America we also have a Constitutional government – A Constitutional government has limits to its power. Opposite of a dictatorial government. Separation of Powers  To avoid the abuse of power, we separate powers into three branches. – Legislative, Executive, and Judicial  These branches…

Words 762 - Pages 4

What Are George Washington's Big Ideas In The Constitution

1) George Washington was one of the “three indispensable men” of the Constitutional convention who had an important role in the outcome of the convention in 1787. George Washington had to be convinced to show up to this event by James Madison and Henry Knox, subsequently he was unanimously made president. They knew that Washington was trusted and respected as a result of his actions during the war they needed Washington to play a central role during the delegates’ decision making. His discreet nature…

Words 648 - Pages 3

Nahir Cramer HIST 101 Assignment 1 Essay

Revolutionary War • Articles of Confederation: Governmental document until Constitution ratified • 25 May 1787: First Constitutional Convention; Independence Hall, Philadelphia, PA • 17 September 1787: Constitution Signed & Distributed to states • 7 December 1787 – 29 May 1790: All original 13 States ratify Constitution Drafting Problems • Division of power • States’ rights vs. federal powers • Procedure to elect a president • Diverging plans • Strong egos of drafters • Regional demands • Distance…

Words 322 - Pages 2

Essay on Concepts for midterm

The behavior of homo sapiens -- human beings tend to pursue their own interests. They behave in ways that promote individual interests, and are motivated by incentives (both positive and negative). This is one of the reasons proposed for the development of governments: groups of individuals all acting in their own interests leads to collective action problems, and governments exist as a solution to those problems. Collective action problem -- this occurs when a group of individuals, each acting…

Words 5510 - Pages 23

Essay on AP Government and Politics

Nat. government could not levy taxes from states No national army No control over trade No supremacy clause No Supreme Court or Executive Amendments required unanimous vote Pass national laws – 9/13 vote Established a Post Office Constitutional Convention – Summer 1787 Aborted Annapolis Meeting – September 1786 Only five states showed up Thomas Hobbes – Man’s natural state was war. A strong leader was needed. Connecticut Compromise Virginia Plan - Representation based on population New…

Words 3262 - Pages 14

history 101 notes Essays

History 101 1/24 Virginia and New England cultures in contrast -New England- families, relative peace with natives, no interaction with natives, religion centered, minimal disease/pollution, no food shortages after 1st winter, high mortality rates, low immigration rates. -Virginia-single men, war with natives, high native population, secular, water pollution, food shortages, low mortality, high immigration rate New England education -puritans began school age 3 or 4 -essentially universal…

Words 4012 - Pages 17