Creativity In Paul's Case

Words: 448
Pages: 2

The majority of humans have been following traditions, yet some stand up and go against traditions, which lead to risks. According to Willa Cather in “Paul’s Case”, the protagonist, who is Paul, got in trouble at school and is waiting for his dad, until he decides to go against traditions which leads to his death. In “Paul’s Case”, Cather uses a third person direct limited omniscient and a physical integral setting to prove a point moving away from traditions creates creativity but also may lead to death.
Insightfully, the author uses a physical integral setting to show the common lifestyle that the town was living. For example, “It was a highly respectable street, where all the houses were exactly alike… businessmen begot large families of children who went to Sabbath-school and interested in arithmetic, all exactly
…show more content…
The climax of the story is his dad is coming to get him from school to work like everyone else, but Paul decides to run away. Namely, “He ran down the hill whistling the Soldiers’ Chorus from Faust, looking wildly behind him now…”(93) Interestingly, She incorporates Paul going to theater, because it is a symbol of creativity. For example, “It was at the theatre and at Carnegie Hall that Paul really lived; the rest was but a sleep and a forgetting.”(99) Insightfully, the last message given by the narrator is how dull the life is by using a flower in winter time. Such as, “It was only one splendid breath they had, in spite of their brave mockery at the winter outside the glass; it was a losing game in the end, this revolt against the homilies by which the world is run.”(109) Expressing her point; the author does prove that jumping off the path that the majority of people are on, does creates creativity. Last, Paul has to be killed off because the narrator has to provide support to her claims, which is not following tradition can lead to