Essay about Crime and Judicial Process

Submitted By kpopbands09
Words: 1414
Pages: 6
Open Document
Ai Le
Ms. McDonald
English 1A
24 October 2014
The Controversy Surrounding Juvenile Justice in the United States In the society we live in today, the majority of juveniles being charged as adults are those that committed felony offenses, but in most cases, not all the youths would warrant aggravated felony charge as if they were an adult. The U.S. juvenile justice system is currently designed to address the special needs of minors who engage in criminal acts, but may not be held fully responsible for their behavior as they are not yet legal adults recognized by society. Even before in 1998 the Supreme Court had banned the execution of teenagers who are under sixteen for their crimes (Liptak). Between 1992 and 1999, all the states except for Nebraska passed the laws that make it easier for juveniles to be tried as adults (Krikorian). Also in 2001, teen brain research has provided concrete evidence that adolescent brains are not fully developed and they are not yet adults (Thompson). The United States Supreme Court had decided to outlaw the death penalty for offenders who committed crimes when they were younger than eighteen in 2005 (Steinberg and Scott). And in 2012, the Supreme Court had made a decision against mandatory life sentences without parole for offenders younger than eighteen (“Supreme”). Juvenile who committed crimes have become a big issue across the whole nation, therefore, the juvenile justice system is important and necessary because it gives them the opportunity to correct their mistakes and resolve problems they have. However, teenagers and children are not as emotionally and mentally developed as adults; they might not have a true grasp of the consequences of a crime and how the rest of their life could be affected. The controversy surrounding adolescents being tried, sentenced as adults, and subjected to serve abuse in prison have make youth offenders less culpable than adults and less worthy punishment and more rehabilitation.
The recent transformation of juvenile law has largely ignored the fact that adolescents, even those who commit serious crimes, are different from adults. In 2005, the United States Supreme Court had banned the death penalty for offenders under the age of 18 when they committed their crimes base on the issue of culpability, or criminal blameworthiness. Steinberg and Scott argue that juveniles should not be held to the same standards of criminal responsibility as adults, because adolescents’ decision-making capacity is diminished, they are less able to resist coercive influence, and their character is still undergoing change. The uniqueness of immaturity as a mitigating condition argues for a commitment to a legal environment under which most youths are dealt with in a separate justice system and none are eligible for capital punishment. Studies have shown that “ Although intellectual abilities stop maturing around the age 16, psychosocial capability continues to develop well into early adulthoods” (Steinberg and Scott). The study’s finding showed several characteristics of adolescence that were related to resolve the criminal culpability.
Adolescent offenders have diminished competence to participate in courts proceeding against them, and their limited capacity also makes them less culpable than adults. According to Greg Krikorian, kids should not be tried as adult because they are not emotionally or intellectually able to defend themselves. A study by a University of Massachusetts professor showed that some kids and teenagers had “level of reasoning and awareness comparable to those of mentally ill adults judged not fit to stand trial” (Krikorian). This is significant because 200,000 juveniles are tried as adults every year, and many states have made it easier to try young people as adults. The two most important factors that can determine youth’s ability to understand the judicial process are age and intelligence. Laurence Steinberg, Temple University professor stated, “It is a
Show More

Related Documents: Essay about Crime and Judicial Process

Discretion In Australia's Criminal Justice System

criminal investigation process (ICP). Discretion is the flexibility of what the outcome should be in a particular situation. Discretion applies to 3 groups or stages of ICP, Reporting which may involve, witnesses, victims or even offenders, police discretion, which involves police deciding whether the criminal act was indictable enough to pursue a further investigation or to charge the offender. Then finally judicial discretion, under the doctrine of the separation of powers, judicial discretion is an…

Words 288 - Pages 2

Penalities and Sentencing Act (1994) - Should it be diminished or removed? Essay

Penalties and Sentences Act of 1994, governs every aspect of Queensland’s sentencing process and is one of our most important pieces of legislation; implementing a completely impartial justice sentencing system. This act attempts to establish a balance between punishments and positive outcomes for all the key stakeholders, but has come under scrutiny of recent times for supposedly being “soft on crime” (Judicial Conference of Australia, 2014). A considerable number of Queenslanders believe however…

Words 1880 - Pages 8

Essay on Courts: Jury and United States

The Judicial Process Courts The Judicial Process There are many components that make up the judicial process. If someone wanted to know the key parts of the judicial process I would start by telling them the types of laws and what they mean. When it comes to laws there is common law and there is statutory laws are the types of laws that are applied here in our judicial system. The next component of our judicial process is the staffing of the…

Words 3416 - Pages 14

Historical Policy Comparison Essay

enforcement, as well as our courts, deal with individuals accused of committing crimes (Marion and Oliver, 2006). The following information will focus on the evolution of policing, our courts, and corrections system into agencies, which reflect the changing and diverse needs of our current population of primary importance, is the need for…

Words 2184 - Pages 9

CRJ 101 Essay

Justice Abstract The purpose of this paper is to describe the various roles and components of criminal justice and how it plays a very important role in our society. The roles of criminal justice are as follow: Officers/Corrections, Courts/Judicial, and Law Enforcement. I am going to explain the importance of each of these roles and how they help our society by the things that they do. Most people are afraid to pertain to police officers or police officials for any matter due to they do not…

Words 1105 - Pages 5

Three Branches Of The Government

2013 The roles of the Legislative, Judiciary, Executive Branches of the Government What are the three branches of the U.S. Government? The three branches of the U.S. Government are Legislative, Judicial, and Executive. They carry out governmental power and functions. Legislative Branch The legislative branch is made up of the two houses of Congress the Senate and the House of Representatives. The most important duty of the legislative…

Words 1157 - Pages 5

Juvenile Incarceration Case Study

There is no doubt that the role of the judicial system is to ensure that justice prevails. In fostering justice, the judicial system must be designed in a manner that it does administer punishment to those who commit a crime. In this case, those accused of committing crimes are put on trial and a verdict is given as to whether they are innocent and or guilty. Various researches have been done and pointed out that juveniles tend to take a longer period to comprehend their actions when incarcerated…

Words 1297 - Pages 6

Court Systems Essay

as cases, crimes on federal property, military lawsuits, immigration cases, Torts between citizens of different states, cases that raise a constitutional and the subject matter jurisdiction cases. In the federal courts there are three levels, supreme, Courts of Appeal and District Courts. The supreme and court of appeals are the appellate courts in which that means, when you have trial and who are not happy with the decision or you believe an error was made during the judicial process. Then you have…

Words 416 - Pages 2

Essay on Rights vs Rehab

determined within the confines of the law. Adults that commit crimes, have a separate legal system that in the criminal process awards the criminal typically community service, tickets, rehabilitation, fines, probation or even incarceration. The juvenile justice system plays a different roll with the mindset that rehabilitation if the first for of prevention and correction. The rehabilitation process holds value because the judicial system understands that there are age related differences mentally…

Words 683 - Pages 3

Juvenile Incarceration Case Study

There is no doubt that the role of the judicial system is to ensure that justice prevails. In fostering justice, the judicial system must be designed in a manner that it administers punishment to those who commit a crime. In this case, those accused of committing crimes are put on trial, typically in family court and a verdict is given as to whether they are innocent and or guilty. Various research has been conducted and pointed out that juveniles tend to take a longer period to comprehend their…

Words 1319 - Pages 6