Dakota Access Pipeline Case Study

Words: 759
Pages: 4

The recent construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline has brought about large protests against its installation. Opposition actions have ranged anywhere from peaceful protests to violent and destructive riots, which has resulted in heavy amounts of attention for the pipeline project. However, despite the ongoing chaos, the construction of the pipeline persists under all conditions. If protesters have been trying so hard to get their point across about their disgust with the pipeline, when will the government realize that it is time to reconsider construction?

According to Oliver Ortega, the Dakota Access Pipeline was first considered then accepted in order to transport oil from the Bakken to refineries in Illinois. Additionally, the pipeline has also been thought to bring job openings, access to natural resources, energy independence, and even tax benefits, says Ron Ness of the Bismarck Tribune. The installment of the pipeline has already brought many jobs to North Dakota in the construction industry, however these will only
…show more content…
Julie Fedorchak claimed in a recent interview that there had been many meetings held throughout the process of procuring permits for the DAPL. Julie Fedorchak details the careful observation of river crossings and cultural resources. She says the pipeline was rerouted 140 times to avoid all important cultural resources, including those of Native Americans. Additionally, Fedorchak offered to punctuate the aspect that the Standing Rock Sioux tribe had been invited to all meetings regarding the pipeline, yet they were never in attendance. She explained how having them present would have been beneficial to have their concerns about the pipeline recognized. Although this may be true, did the tribe have justifiable grounds for their absence? Perhaps they have been dealt a great deal of disrespect