Both of the arguments center around the idea of how advertisements impact both schools, teachers, and the kids. Dave Kessler from 6th grade argues that the schools should not use advertisements because they are manipulative and greedy but without them he says they're are budget cuts and while he does want his school to have money he claims that while ads do pay schools they do not pay enough so whats the difference?
Although Dave does have a good point, he does not use any evidence to support his claim. Dave's tone also suggests that he is not very confident in his argument which makes it sound unreliable on the other hand, Janet Chen also a 6th grader, argues that ads help schools raise money and keep their teachers. She also uses evidence
