David Foster Wallace's Essay 'Consider The Lobster'

Words: 256
Pages: 2
Open Document
In David Foster Wallace’s essay “Consider the lobster”, he discusses the concern with the ethics of boiling a creature alive to enhance the consumer's pleasure. He also argues if these “sentiment creatures” can or cannot feel the pain of being boiled alive. This then brings up the question “is it morally acceptable for humans to eat animals?” And the answer is absolutely. It is morally acceptable for humans to eat animals because our life spans would shorten if we lived on a plant based diet, meat is a natural part of life, but there should be a limit on the amount of meat we consume. Some people might oppose eating meat and argue that killing animals for our consumption pleasures is animal cruelty and against animal rights.
Show More

Related Documents: David Foster Wallace's Essay 'Consider The Lobster'

Consider The Lobster Rhetorical Analysis Essay

specific description found throughout “Consider the Lobster” and an example can be found when Wallace describes the mascot of the Lobster Festival he is attending. This mascot is described as ”on six-foot stilts in a raincoat with plastic lobsters protruding from all directions on springs” (Wallace 2). Another strategy Wallace uses, rather often, is comparison/contrast. An example of this being found in the passage is when he mentions the major two viewpoints of lobster eating; “Is it right to boil a sentient…

Words 1253 - Pages 6