Does Atticus Finch Use Ethos Pathos Logos In To Kill A Mockingbird

Words: 596
Pages: 3

To Kill a Mockingbird Over 10,000 innocent people a year go to jail for such crimes that they did not commit. In the story “To Kill a Mockingbird” a young black man named Tom Robinson is accused of raping and beating a young white lady, Miss Ewell. Even though there is enough evidence to show that Tom did not commit such crimes, the jury still comes to the decision that he is guilty. The jury came to this conclusion just because he was a black male coming onto a white lady; in the 1930’s people were very racist and saw this as unspeakable. Atticus Finch used logos and ethos statements as evidence in Tom Robinson’s case and to prove he is innocent. topic, evidence, commentary Atticus Finch used logos statements as evidence in the Tom Robinson …show more content…
When Atticus brings up that Tom had been to jail before and explained why, Tom admitted to it without problem showing that he had nothing to hide. It maybe have brought back memories that Robinson didn’t not want to remember but he was honest because he swore to tell nothing but the truth. The jury hearing that he had been to jail before should have showed them that he is young and has already suffered enough; he should not be put in jail for something he didn’t do especially since he has already had to live the hell of being there. Atticus also used ethos when he brought up Mayella Ewell and asked her to tell him her side of the story. He knew what really happened and he was asking her repeatedly to see if she would finally commit to what she had lied about. She said in the story that she'd never kissed an adult man before, and that what her father does to her doesn't count. This just shows that it was probably her father that did these things to her and that the reason she can’t admit it is not because she wants Tom to go to jail but because she is afraid of what her father will do to her if he finds out. This shows that Mr. Ewell was the guilty one in this whole situation and that Tom was really an innocent young male, but the jury did not take that to mind. They continued to be prejudice and