Dred Scott V. Sandford Analysis

Words: 1688
Pages: 7
Open Document
Dred Scott v. Sandford was arguably the most famous Supreme Court case of the 19th century. Through a majority opinion from seven of the nine justices, they ruled that African-Americans like Dred Scott and his family can never be American citizens based solely on their ancestry and that Congress had no right to make laws interfering with or prohibiting the practice of slavery. The case embodied the political sectionalism that has been splitting the country apart since the Missouri Compromise in 1820, as well as the frustration that slavery had not been defined or outlined at the federal level. Because the United States Constitution had never explicitly mentioned or defined slavery, the North and the South grew increasingly polarized in their …show more content…
In particular, they had contradicting laws concerning the status of slaves should they move to a state that abolished slavery. Following the case of Somerset v. Stewart, in which an English court ruled that an escaped American slave was free because he had landed on English soil, the North and the South developed different interpretations of the decision. “In some northern states…sojourning rights were acknowledged and specified by statute…southern courts, for their part, consistently ruled that a slave to live permanently in a Free State or territory was thereby emancipated”. Naturally, these contradictions propelled the Dred Scott case to national prominence. Because Dred Scott had resided in a free territory for a number of years with his master, most northern courts would declare him a free man, but southern courts would argue that he was not free because he had moved back to a slave state …show more content…
After a series of court delays and subsequent appeals from Scott’s new owner, Irene Emerson, a St. Louis circuit court reviewed the case in 1848. In Scott v. Emerson, Scott’s counsel asserted that because Scott had been living in a free territory with his master at Fort Snelling, in the Wisconsin Territory. Citing the previous case of Rachel v. Walker, in which a slave was set free because she had resided in a free territory, they argued that Scott and his family are free because they had lived in the north for four years. Judge Alexander Hamilton, known for his sympathy for freedom cases, sided with the Scotts, declared Scott free. Not willing to give up, Emerson appealed to the Missouri Supreme Court in 1850 and the case opened in 1852. This time, luck was not on Scott’s side due to the newly decided Supreme Court decision of Strader v. Graham. Written by none other than pro-Southern Chief Justice Roger Taney, the Court’s decision stated “Every state has an undoubted right to determine the status, or domestic and social condition of the persons domiciled within its territory except insofar as the powers of the states in this respect are restrained, or duties and obligations imposed upon them, by the Constitution of the United States”. In short, the state decides by
Show More

Related Documents: Dred Scott V. Sandford Analysis

Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis

In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case (argued 1856 - decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Supreme argued that Scott's status as a citizen of a free state under the Missouri Compromise did not give him status as a U.S. citizen. While states were free to create their own citizenship criteria, the Constitution only gives Congress authority to define national citizenship. The Court…

Words 153 - Pages 1

Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis

Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri who lived in the free state of Illinois from 1833 to 1843. He later returned to Missouri and sued the Missouri courts for his freedom in 1846. His argument with state courts was that because he lived in a free state, he was a free man. This was unsuccessful and the case was appealed . Scott then brought his case to the federal courts. Unfortunately the verdict was the same and it was ruled that Scott was still considered a slave in the state of Missouri. Scott appealed…

Words 829 - Pages 4

Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis

Dred Scott v. Sandford This case involved a man named Dred Scott. Scott was a slave and lived in the slave state known as Missouri. In 1834 Illinois was considered a free state due to the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Also in the year 1834, Scott was purchased by a white man, and then moved to Illinois with his new owner. The dream was too short for Scott because Scott and his owner eventually returned to Missouri. Dred Scott felt that because he had lived in Illinois, a free slave territory, he should…

Words 238 - Pages 1

Formative Civil Rights Essay

by the Supreme Court to discover whether discrimination is permissible? a. Reasonableness, inherently suspect, and the intermediate standard b. Reasonableness, inherently suspect, and grossly discriminatory c. Arguably discriminatory, reasonable analysis, and negligent d. Negligent, arguably discriminatory, and reasonable e. Suspect, inherently suspect, and the intermediate standard Answer: a 3. The courts have recently ruled that, under the Fourteenth Amendment, racial and ethnic classifications…

Words 2961 - Pages 12

Department of English Spring 2014 Course Descriptions Essays

Department of English Spring 2014 Course Descriptions 89S. Imagining War. Instructor M. Maiwald. WF 8:30-9:45 In this course, we will consider how the experience of war has been represented in American fiction, non-fiction, and film. We will investigate how attitudes toward war have evolved throughout American history: our timeline begins with the Civil War—the traumatic event that birthed the modern American state—and ends with the recent conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. In particular…

Words 9501 - Pages 39