Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Summary

Words: 355
Pages: 2

The Chief Justice Roger Taney decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford case was biased and racist. Before Dred Scott’s ownership was transferred to Sandford, the slave lived in free states and territories as his previous owner, an army officer, got transferred. Within that time, Scott enjoyed some privileges of being free, such as marriage. However, as he had to return to his original state, Missouri, he thought he had the right to enjoy the same liberties he had in Illinois and Wisconsin Territory. Fighting for his emancipation, he prosecuted Sandford. However, Chief Justice Roger Taney, a Southerner slaveholder, let his beliefs interfere with the judgment of the case. Regarding this case and also revealing his opinion about slavery, he said that