Dred Scott Vs Sandford

Words: 1303
Pages: 6
Open Document
Dred Scott v. Sandford is one of the most controversial court cases in American history. From the racial connotations, to the biased jury, it is still up for debate the legality of the decision. Dred Scott V. Sandford remains more important than a case like Brown v. Board of Education because of its impact causing increased abolitionist activism and division in the union. Dred Scott was born a slave in 1799 in Southampton County, Virginia. Though his full name and parents are unknown, everyone around him on the plantation called him Sam. He was born a slave owned by the family of Peter Blow. They were originally farmers, but then moved to St. Louis, Missouri to open a boarding house. Dred was sold to a man by the name of John Emerson in 1832 …show more content…
The democratic party split because of the judgement. Because there were Democrats in both the North and the South, there was no way it could stand even if Scott was ruled free . It also declared that Dred had no right to sue, because he was property. It all came down to the place of residence at the time. It was ruled that Illinois law had no effect on him because he was living in slave-Missouri at the time of the trial. One of, if not the most, important effects of the decision was that it declared all blacks, even free blacks, could never become citizens of the United States. Of course, this outraged the newly formed Republican party, and they knew they had to do something about this outrageous and ungrounded decision. Northerners viewed this decision by the predominantly slave-holding, southern jury and judge as a declaration of war by the South, but not a declaration of literal war, but instead a declaration of war on Northern ideals and beliefs. Many newspapers from the time claimed the decision was heavily influenced by a slave power conspiracy. These same newspapers also claimed that president Buchanan and other Democratic politicians were a part of this conspiracy. "Our readers will bear with us if we frequently bring this matter to their notice. Since the organization of the government, no event has occurred that will entail upon the country the consequences, which are involved in this partisan movement of the slavery propagandists. It is the first step in a revolution which, if not arrested, nullifies the Revolution of '76 and makes us all slaves again." wrote the Chicago Daily Tribune in response to the decision. This article served as a sort of call to arms for the North, and they rallied behind it. Understandably, the reaction from the North was quite different from the reaction from the South. Southerners actually laughed at the whole
Show More

Related Documents: Dred Scott Vs Sandford

Dred Scott Vs. Sandford Case Analysis

The case of Dred Scott vs Sandford is perhaps one of the most well-known cases in the United States. This case exhibits the almost complete absence of justice, human rights, and the unbiased decision by the court and juries. Dred Scott supported his case with valid evidence and reasoning, yet the court of law still saw him as an inferior and did not judge his case validly or fairly. It was in the early 1840’s and the tension of slavery between the north and the south was rising all throughout the…

Words 1506 - Pages 7

Dred Scott Vs Sandford Case Study

were exempted were the African slaves and their descendants. They were kept from enjoying their basic human rights. However, eventually the ruling the over turned and seen as unconstitutional. This decision was made in the Supreme Court case, Dred Scott v. Sandford. The second class of people who were exempted were unborn children. This decision was made in the Supreme Court case, Roe v. Wade. The court decided that unborn children do not have the right and freedom to live. Unfortunately,…

Words 365 - Pages 2

Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis

Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri who lived in the free state of Illinois from 1833 to 1843. He later returned to Missouri and sued the Missouri courts for his freedom in 1846. His argument with state courts was that because he lived in a free state, he was a free man. This was unsuccessful and the case was appealed . Scott then brought his case to the federal courts. Unfortunately the verdict was the same and it was ruled that Scott was still considered a slave in the state of Missouri. Scott appealed…

Words 829 - Pages 4

Freedom Dred Scott's Case Analysis

Armed with new lawyer the Scotts made it to the US Supreme court. The significance of this case was apparent when two powerful lawyers joined Sanford’s team. Henry Geyer was not only a senator, but a powerhouse in the legal community in Washington, which made him a hard person to go up against. The other powerhouse of the team was Reverdy Johnson. Like Geyer, Johnson was also a senator as well as the Attorney General for the state of Maryland. Having two senators as legal representatives proved just…

Words 1027 - Pages 5

Essay Flight Pattern

I believe has to do with the court case Dred Scott vs. Sandford. Dred Scott was an African American slave that petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for his freedom. They ruled the Bill of Rights did not apply to African Americans, so he lost his case, but when the 14th amendment came along, it made it the law. 4.) The picture with Louisiana Railroad on it, I believe to have to do with the Supreme Court case Plessy vs. Ferguson. It started out as the Plessy vs. The State of Louisiana case due to the…

Words 400 - Pages 2

14th Amendment Advantages

The 14th amendment was the major thing in the civil war. The civil rights movement was able to make major changes in the world. The amendment insures that everyone would be treated equally. The civil rights movement and american people used the 14th amendment to make important advancement for civil rights. Once the 14th amendment was passed the american people did not like that so they went to court and fought for the amendment to be violated. Following its agreement by the necessary three quarters…

Words 512 - Pages 3

Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis

The 1850 Compromise were issued to try to resolve the issue without war. In 1853 a slave named Dred Scott sued for his freedom in St. Louis. This case was known as “Scott v. Sandford.” Dred Scott lost the supreme court case 7-2. The court declared that Scott had no right to sue because he was not a United States citizen, due to his heritage, and deemed The Missouri Compromise Unconstitutional. The Dred Scott…

Words 1526 - Pages 7

Missouri Compromise Research Paper

its free state position, while the South held it’s non-restricting ways. The bill was controversial, because many believed the country would be divided. The Missouri Compromise was repealed in 1854 by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and during Dred Scott vs. Sandford it was made unconstitutional. Tensions over slavery laws eventually led to the Civil…

Words 441 - Pages 2

Abraham Lincoln's Criticism Of His Resolve

Lincoln had a plan. His aspiration was none other than saving the Union, and with this, he stuck through. Lincoln faced tremendous political and social pressures in the few years leading up, ultimately, to his assassination. Who could forget Dred Scott vs. Sandford--the court case that arguably lit the fuse that started the war altogether? These were acrimonious times, and Lincoln’s kindheartedness was seemingly easy to take advantage of. However, this mass ridicule did not stop Lincoln, as he emphatically…

Words 504 - Pages 3

Essay about Chicken Tenders

collect taxes Marshall found it reasonable fro Congress to establish a bank In answer to the second question, state tax violated the supremacy clause because ind. States cannot interfere with the operations of the national government B.) Gibbons vs. Ogden (1824) NY state legislature granted Robert Fulton exclusive rights to operate steamboats on the Hudson River Congress licensed ship to sail on same waters NY and NJ wanted to control shipping on the lower Hudson River SCOTUS ruled that Congress’…

Words 1306 - Pages 6