Drug Testing Welfare Recipients Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 699
Pages: 3

Counter-argument for “Drug Testing Welfare Recipients”
In Aljohara Albadi’s essay, she supports drug testing welfare recipients. She offers her thesis - because the welfare programs will not fade for a time, all welfare recipients should get drug testing in order to be qualified for the check. She uses her modest tone to persuade the hostile that welfare recipients should be drug tested. Her starting point is good that if welfare recipients need to pass the drug test for the check, there will be fewer drug users. However, there are several arguments which are not convinced.
From her first argument, she refers to an article written in 2011 that shows “Most estimates find that 5 to 10 percent of welfare recipients have substance abuse problems,
…show more content…
However, millions of dollars will be spent on taking action of drug testing and when the drug testing is carried out to the poor, it will make poor feel like they are treated as criminals (Masson). How unworthy it is! Why not just directly put this money to improve lives of the poor?
There are some other problems in her essay. “ We are a democratic society, not a socialist one.” This is her potential bias in socialist countries. Whether drug testing welfare recipients is a hotly debated topic at present. The US, a democratic country, still struggles with this problem. Thus, It has nothing with the country system and it is just the problem which exists. “Regardless of which side you are on concerning the welfare debate, it is undeniable that majority of people receiving welfare are abusing the system.” There is no evidence she offers that the welfare recipients are abusing the system.
To reply the question (“Do you want to keep the money that you work so hard for to go to supporting your family or potential drug habits of a family with no ambition?”) at the end in the closing paragraph, the answer will be yes for many people. To get rid of illegal actions of these people and maintain the stabilization of society, keeping the poor able to live is valuable and