Edward Koch Death Penalty Summary

Words: 544
Pages: 3

The article titled ``The Death Penalty: Is it justified? `` was written by Edward L. Koch, is the type of reading that is though provoking as well as a stimulant for further study and discussion. It addresses the death penalty and questions if it is justifiable. Overall, Koch's essay is in favor of the death penalty. However, he uses a counterargument to organize his thought process. It focuses, however, primarily on seven reasons behind it as well as with evidence where he rejects them all. This analysis identifies the main claims; the evidence used to support these claims, and the key assumptions. Koch makes seven main claims and supplies some evidence. Finally, the assumptions underlying the article are analyzed. Koch was a mayor of New York from 1978 to 1989. This essay first appeared in the New Republic on April 15, 1985. He gives a more traditional view on the death penalty from a member of the Democratic Party.
Koch categorizes this essay very well. In the beginning of this essay, Koch goes on to discuss a case about a man named Robert Lee Willie, who was convicted of raping and murdering an 18 year old
…show more content…
In the sub arguments Mr. Koch, you can say he plays with the reader’s logic. Koch has the ability to show the reader that he is credible is what allows him to easily gain the reader’s trust. For instance, when Koch was expressing that death penalty fortifies the estimation of human life, he demanded that in the event that you bring down the punishment for assault, that it would be a reasonable flag that you diminish the respect for the casualty's torment and mortification, and applies a similar rationale for murder. This announcement, and others like it, where written to bring about the pursuer to concur with him basically on the grounds that rationale directs