Equality 7-2521 And Objectivism

Words: 831
Pages: 4

Equality 7-2521 is raised in a society where the leaders enforce a strict regime of collectivism. In this dystopic society, the “World Council is the body of all truth” (19). This World Council, or the leaders of the society dictate what the populace thinks, feels and does, creating a reality of an all-encompassing control over all aspects of the individuals’ lives. However, Equality 7-2521 manages to escape the system and consequently becomes illuminated about the values of objectivism and he realizes the extent which the leaders have oppressed individuality. And Equality 7-2521 affirms his individuality to improve quality of life and Equality finally begins to lead a rational life in an irrational society. Equality clearly denounces the …show more content…
Once Equality separates from the collective he begins to understand people’s values and beliefs for existence. Equality learns that “my happiness is no the means to any end. It is the end. It is its own goal. It is its own purpose” (94). The leaders have architected a society where the social regulations dictate every action of the collective so that everything must have a net benefit for the entire system, however Equality learns that his only moral obligation is to himself. Equality has no obligation to serve the collective or anyone. Humans earn our own happiness in the world but the leaders distract the people from their moral obligation to themselves and force them to work for the collective, creating the illusion of happiness in a false life. That is why Equality denounces the system, they say individuals were born to serve the collective but people only need to serve themselves. Furthermore, Equality further speculates that “I wished to know the meaning of things. I am the meaning” (94). The leaders prevent individuals from actually living that individuals don’t even know their meaning for existence. Nevertheless, Equality sees through the incorrect morals of the leaders and learns that life only has the meaning he gives it, a unique individual. What is morally correct is what people give meaning to. Equality denounces the society for attempting to create any other reason for life than people’s own existence. This is morally incorrect because the leader’s ideals de-value life by saying the collective is the meaning for