Essay On Meursault In Albert Camus's 'The Stranger'

Words: 642
Pages: 3

Meursault, the main character in Albert Camus’s The Stranger, is judged immoral by many characters throughout the novel. Most notably this judgment comes from the jury that tries him for a murder he committed. However, Meursault is anything but immoral; he is simply reserved, bad at expressing his emotions, leading him to be misunderstood and misrepresented. Initially the reader is forced to see Meursault in the same light that the jury does, based on Meursault’s presentation. Lines like: “Maman died today,” and “Marie said it was terrible and I didn’t say anything,” give the reader a sense of his immorality when they are actually examples of Meursault being inexpressive and not understanding society, respectively. During the vigil and the funeral …show more content…
One mustn’t entirely blame the jury though, it is said that actions speak louder than words, and judging solely by his actions, Meursault does seem immoral. He sends his mother away to a home, doesn’t visit her, appears uncaring when she dies, engages in an affair with Marie the very next day, and kills a man in cold blood. It is only because the reader is shown his thoughts and given ample opportunity to step into Meursault’s shoes that the reader can see that he is moral. For example, when Meursault is at his mother’s funeral, the other visitors will see only his haste in getting away, while the reader is able to feel his frustration and confusion, even his anger at the situation. While the court views Marie as a mistress and calls her relationship a “dubious liaison” the reader knows that Meursault has feelings for her, and needed her to comfort him after the death of his mother. The jury at the trial is not afforded these insights though and is instead forced to view Meursault’s morality based solely on his actions, but the reader sees all this and can thus judge Meursault