Evidence In 12 Angry Men

Words: 410
Pages: 2
Open Document
Serving on a jury is necessary for the American judicial system, and every American citizen should take part on a jury at least once, for the reasons that; people of different backgrounds bring important information, and every citizen has the right to voice an opinion. In the play Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, Juror Five states “Switch knives come with the neighborhood I lived in….Anyone who’s ever used a switch knife would never have stabbed downward”. This Juror grew up in the slums, and a result of that, Juror Five provided valuable information for the case, which swayed other jurors votes from guilt, to not guilty. The more people who serve on a jury will result in more backgrounds, therefore; there is different perspectives on evidence
Show More

Related Documents: Evidence In 12 Angry Men

12 Angry Men Establish Evidence

Twelve Angry Men is a play that tries to teach its readers not to allow negative situations in their own lives to affect how they treat other people later on. Establish Evidence:This play sets up a court case in which a young boy is charged with the murder of his father. At the start of the play, eleven of the jurors think he is guilty. However, towards the end of the play, the coin flips and eleven jurors think he is not guilty, and the only man left to change his verdict is juror three. Earlier…

Words 596 - Pages 3

The Twelve Angry Men Juror 3 and Juror 8 Comparing Essay

Comparison essay comparing Juror 3 and Juror 8 What are some similarities between Jurors 3 and 8? What about differences? Oh gosh, it's been years since I've seen the movie (didn't read the play). Okay, Juror #3 is the angry father, and Juror #8 is the guy who stands alone in the INNOCENT vote, right? I suspect the similarities are easier to find by reading the play because the movie really shows their contrasts. There is one similarity in that when they really believe something, they…

Words 1921 - Pages 8

Jurors In 12 Angry Men

In 12 Angry Men, a young adult of eighteen years old was accused of killing his own father. Twelve jurors had to decide whether the young adult was innocent or guilty. The punishment was going to be the death penalty if he were guilty. It took three hours for the twelve jurors to come to the conclusion. At first, it was eleven to one, who thought that the boy was at fault, but at the end, the twelve men concluded that the young boy was innocent. They came to this conclusion by going over facts really…

Words 1655 - Pages 7

Proving Guilt In 12 Angry Men

In the Judicial system, men and women are given a chance to a fair trial to prove their innocence of the crime they are being accused of. The defendant gets the opportunity to defend their innocence and the accusers have the obligation to prove guilt. Arguments are allowed from both sides and the jury has the final say on the defendants fait. In the film 12 Angry Men, directed by Sidney Lumet, takes place in the courthouse where an eighteen year old boy is being tried for stabbing his father in the…

Words 506 - Pages 3

12 Angry Men Essay

Carolyn Zhao Business Law Period 8 12 Angry Men Essay 12 Angry Men is a play set in New York City in 1957. It takes place in a court of law jury room and begins with the Judge instructing the jurors that if the murder case is proven guilty, the defendant will be sentenced with the death penalty. The case involves the son being accused of murdering his father. As a result, the twelve jurors begin voting on if the defendant is guilty or not. All of the jurors vote guilty except for Juror #8. Due…

Words 470 - Pages 2

Prejudice In Twelve Angry Men

United States constitution states, “No person shall...be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”. This ensures that no one is given a fair and impartial trial. Due Process is central to the plot of “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose. In the story 12 jury members are faced with the murder trial of a young man, accused of killing his father. One of the purposes of the play is to expose the prejudices that are brought into the courtroom by a jury. In the 1997 the defendant is…

Words 581 - Pages 3

Essay about 12 Angry Men Analysis

Jazmin Alfaro Mrs. Danelle Taylor-Johnston English Communications-2 20 November 2014 12 Angry Men Analysis When I first started watching 12 Angry Men, I was dreading it because I was expecting it to be boring but it was the opposite. I am quite sure that the movie was one of the best movies I have seen at school. The juror I was assigned to was #1, who was a timid little man. In the beginning, I noticed that #1 voted the boy guilty because he wanted to to leave the jury, especially since it was…

Words 321 - Pages 2

Reginald Rose's Personal Bias In 12 Angry Men

personal bias? This type of situation consisted in the movie 12 Angry Men and I think that personal biases should never determine if somebody will die or be imprisoned, However, in the movie/play the guilty verdict was able to be stopped before it was too late. At first the little things in a case might not seem like much at first but in the outcome it could determine somebody’s future, whether it’s for the better or the worst. In 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Jurors #3 and #4 use bias as a reason…

Words 662 - Pages 3

Essay about 12 Angry Men

210 Critical thinking 26 March 2015 Twelve Angry Men The movie Twelve Angry men directed by Sidney Lumet is about following the closing arguments in a murder trial, the 12 members of the jury must deliberate, with a guilty verdict meaning death for the accused, an inner-city teen. As the dozen men try to reach a unanimous decision. While everyone believe the teen is guilty right away all expect one juror. Making so they have to look at all the evidence again to reach a verdict Relates to critical…

Words 742 - Pages 3

Prejudice In Twelve Angry Men

a learned trait. You’re not born prejudiced; you’re taught it. In the modern drama Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, the story tells about 12 jurors in a room together who are tasked with deciding the verdict on a murder charge against a 19 year old for murdering his father. As evidence and arguments come to light, the twelve juror’s personalities clash as they choose on this final verdict. Twelve Angry Men demonstrated not only that life lesson on prejudice during the text, but also a lesson on…

Words 743 - Pages 3