Fallacy: Fallacy and Argument Essays

Submitted By Maika-Lê
Words: 5195
Pages: 21
Open Document
WSS: Logical Fallacies
Logical fallacies are errors in arguments. We need to be able to assess an argument on the logic of its presentation; that is, whether the premises lead to a valid conclusion. It is irrelevant whether or not we agree with the conclusion; we need to be able to assess whether the conclusion is based on sound premises and reasons. The more we seek to analyse others’ arguments, the better we become at constructing our own arguments.

Many people claim to be arguing rationally and logically, when all they are doing is asserting their scepticism. If there is no evidence to support this sceptical assertion, then it is still not an argument, but only an opinion.

To assess an argument, try to stand back from your personal preferences and beliefs.
We may wish to believe in the conclusion, but we can also accept that the conclusion is not logically argued.

To assess the strength of an argument, look at how the argument is constructed.

1. What is the overall conclusion(s)?
2. What are the premises/evidence/data/reasonings to support that conclusion(s)?
3. Are the premises valid?
4. Do the premises lead to a logical conclusion?

The following are examples of logical fallacies, sorted under their names. Towards the end, I have gathered the logical fallacies under their general headings (fallacies of distortion, fallacies of generalisation etc). It may help to remember them if they are categorised in this way. I have not given descriptions, or made many notes here. Read the examples, and see if you can see where the fault is in the argument. If you cannot see any fault in the argument feel free to email me.

There are several reading practices throughout - evaluate the arguments for logic and soundness and see how many fallacies you can detect. Remember, to analyse an argument means to assess whether it is valid and logical. We may actually agree with the point of the author- but we may also see that the point is not argued logically. On the other hand, we may have to admit that he argument is logical, even if we, personally, do not agree with the point. Logical and critical analysis involves us having to understand our own opinions, and put them aside.

Begging the Question (Petitio principii)
The government’s budget proposals for an improvement in our economy are fundamentally flawed; they simply will not work.

The sentence has what seems to be two parts: a premise and a conclusion: which is which??
This fallacy occurs if you assume as a premise the conclusion which you wish to reach. Often, the proposition is rephrased so that the fallacy appears to be a valid argument. For example:
"Homosexuals must not be allowed to hold government office. Hence any government official who is revealed to be a homosexual will lose his job. Therefore homosexuals will do anything to hide their secret, and will be open to blackmail. Therefore homosexuals cannot be allowed to hold government office."
Note that the argument is entirely circular; the premise is the same as the conclusion. An argument like the above has actually been cited as the reason for the British Secret Services' official ban on homosexual employees.

To cast abortion as a solely private moral question,…is to lose touch with common sense: How human beings treat one another is practically the definition of a public moral matter. Of course, there are many private aspects of human relations, but the question whether one human being should be allowed fatally to harm another is not one of them. Abortion is an inescapably public matter."

A question begging epithet is a word, often used as an adjective, which in slyly inserted to persuade the listener to accept the speaker’s judgment without having to give evidence for that judgment
Eg. That incompetent minister Bloggs should be sacked.

Compound Question /Loaded Question

A compound question is one which is phrased in such a way so as to unfairly limit the
Show More

Related Documents: Fallacy: Fallacy and Argument Essays

Explain When Does An Argument Commit The Fallacy Of Appeal To Force

When does an argument commit the fallacy of appeal to force? Why should we avoid this? How can it be avoided? Give three "real life" detailed examples. An argument commits the fallacy of force when either, a threat is issued with it, or there is mention of some unfortunate circumstance that may occur as a result. The way to avoid it is to reject the argument on the face of it since the premise only gives a reason for its irrelevance. A person who genuinely wants to persuade the other person…

Words 309 - Pages 2

Italy: Informal Fallacy Informal Essay

of fallacies From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search For specific popular misconceptions, see List of common misconceptions. A fallacy is incorrect argument in logic and rhetoric resulting in a lack of validity, or more generally, a lack of soundness. Fallacies are either formal fallacies or informal fallacies. Contents 1 Formal fallacies 1.1 Propositional fallacies 1.2 Quantification fallacies 1.3 Formal syllogistic fallacies…

Words 4737 - Pages 19

AFitzpatrick CN Ch3 Pg88 104 Essay

Notes: What is a logical fallacy? An error in reasoning, or common error in reasoning opposite of a factual error which is simply being wrong about the facts. What is a deductive fallacy? Sometimes called a formal fallacy is a deductive argument that has premises that are all true but they lead to a false conclusion, making it an invalid argument. What is an inductive fallacy? Sometimes known as an informal fallacy an inductive fallacy appears to be an inductive argument, but the premises do not…

Words 626 - Pages 3

Examples Of Informal Fallacies

The presence of informal fallacies when implemented by the media can create a broad passage of ignorance and flawed information to those who wish to involve themselves on particular subject matter. In general, a fallacy is an argument or opinion that is intended to persuade, but, in reality is faulty. The use of fallacies in the media are not uncommon, as those who wish to express his or her viewpoint do so, in various ways, such as commercials, magazine and newspaper articles and many other methods…

Words 632 - Pages 3

18 Reasoning Errors Essay

Top of Form Reasoning Errors (with answers and notes) Argument 1 All persons in the secretaries' union are persons who make a lot of money. Ann is a secretary. Therefore, Ann is a person who makes a lot of money. Answer: Four-term fallacy The terms “persons in the secretaries’ union” and “secretary” are two different terms thus making the syllogism invalid because it has four terms instead of three. Argument 2 Only man (not the plants or animals) is that which has been called by God to…

Words 2019 - Pages 9

Logical Fallacies: Video Analysis

Logical Fallacies After watching the videos, I have a better understanding of logical fallacies. Each video was always able to present new information that the previous video did not. All the videos had different ways of teaching different things, but they always had something in common with each other. The first video, “Logical Fallacies”, was almost like a pre-recorded PowerPoint presentation. It gave background information, as well as laid the foundation for later videos, by introducing…

Words 475 - Pages 2

Critical Thinking and Single Time Essay

Courtney Force Phil110 Wawrytko Fallacy Essay When you are unaware of what fallacies are, they are easily overlooked and every argument seems logical. However, when one becomes aware of fallacies it is easy to identify them and see the fallaciousness of various arguments, ads, comics and statements. After being on the Speech and Debate in high school, I realized how often people rely on fallacious arguments to prove their points. The fallacy that I have encountered the most and that I am…

Words 377 - Pages 2

Rhetorical Analysis Of Fallacies In Trump's Speech

In addition to the false statements that GOP presidential nominee Trump makes use of in his speech, there are also several fallacies present throughout. These errors in reasoning undermine the logic of the argument at several moments throughout the speech. As previously stated, Trump’s statement regarding the shooter’s birthplace create an Appeal to Ignorance fallacy. The Communication Department at CSU Fullerton described the Appeal to Ignorance as the attempt “to use an opponent’s inability to…

Words 639 - Pages 3

Appendix D Hum/ 176 Week7 Essay

Associate Level Material Appendix D Assumptions and Fallacies Write a 150- to 200-word response to each of the following questions: What are assumptions? How do you think assumptions might interfere with critical thinking? What might you do to avoid making assumptions in your thinking? At first glance, assumptions may not seem like they belong in the critical thinking process. However, your assumptions are a key factor because they give you quite a bit to think critically about! In…

Words 436 - Pages 2

Syllogism: False Dilemma, Circular Reasoning,

enthymemes and logical fallacies appear to be vital forms of persuasion, but they don’t provide any sort of reasonable logic or support for the argument. A syllogism is a method which provides a conclusion based on two assumed premises, one often globally understood and one more specific. An enthymeme reaches its conclusion based on an assumption that is not clearly states; oftentimes the premise is disguised by a “fact” following the word because. Finally, logical fallacy, perhaps the most complex…

Words 587 - Pages 3