Federalist Papers: Fundamentals To Ratify The Constitution

Words: 524
Pages: 3

Have you ever wondered why The Federalist Papers were written? The Federalist Papers were fundamental to the ratification of the US Constitution. They were fundamental because they helped persuade New Yorkers into ratifying the Constitution. They are also used today to help us to clearly understand what the Constitution is saying. Although, many would say that the Anti Federalist Papers were fundamental instead of the Federalist Papers. The 85 essays succeeded by helping to persuade doubtful New Yorkers to ratify the Constitution. "To address the fears that the Constitution could give the central government too much control and power by limiting individual freedom, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison carefully looked at the Constitution in great detail and described the checks and balances built into the document which were made to carefully divide power between the three different branches of government while protecting the rights of the states and people." (kids.laws.com). Hamilton, Jay, and Madison realized the fears of the people …show more content…
"One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states. Others argued that a new centralized government would have all the characteristics of the despotism of Great Britain that they had fought so hard to remove themselves from. Still others feared that the new government threatened their personal liberties." (Constitution Facts) The many authors of the Anti Federalist Papers tried to convince the United States citizens that the new Constitution would make a centralized government while taking away many rights of state governments. Although the Anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in the prevention of the adoption of the Constitution, their efforts were responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of