Foucault's Panopticon

Words: 1652
Pages: 7

Linking the classic and post-modern sociologists is a great intellectual temptation for the social scientist. Indeed, Max Weber and Michel Foucault’s similar focus on manifestations of power and rationality invite comparison, with some going so far as to view Weber as an outright precursor to Foucault (O’Neil, 1986, p. 43). However, doing so risks muddying the complexities of Weber and Foucault’s conceptualisations. Weber sees power, for example, as one of many forces in a multidimensional framework, working in tandem and conflict with other forces (Jiménez-Anca, 2013, p. 43). This may seem at first to resemble Foucault’s interpretation, as he sees power as part of a ‘net-like organisation’ (Foucault, 1986, p. 234), however, to Foucault power takes on a ubiquitous, ever-present nature, as thus …show more content…
In his criticism of Foucault’s conception of the panopticon, C. Fred Alford learned from his visits to prisons, that the empirical reality was of prison differed highly from Foucault’s account. Instead of the panopticons overbearing presence influencing the discipline of the prisoners and the guards, guards cared so little about the inmates, that their only major commitment was to containment (Alford, 2000, p. 125). Apparent programs of organisation born out of the physicality of panopticon, such as the routine of the timetable, and precise psychological characterisation of prisoners had little to no prevalence in practice (Alford, 2000, p. 125). Furthermore, prisoners would simply avoid surveillance through shields of cardboard or blanket, much to the indifference of officials (Alford, 2000, p. 125). Thus, in detailing the panopticon, and similar forms of rationalisation, Foucault utilized the Weberian ‘ideal type’ to a far greater extent than maybe he would have