Frederick Douglass Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 528
Pages: 3

“They were honest and courageous foeman…” These words were spoken by the Union veteran Ambrose Bierce who had fought against the Confederates in West Virginia. He showed no animosity toward the Confederate he had fought, rather he had respect. Frederick Douglass held a similar attitude in May 1878, an attitude filled with “charity toward all, and malice toward none.” Even in the continual face of rampant discrimination and white supremacism from leaders of the Democratic Party, Frederick Douglass fought for justice and equality. Frederick Douglass responded to Confederate sympathizers by acknowledging their treason and wrongdoings, but moving ahead with charity and unification for all. In 1873, one of the most prominent Confederate sympathizers was President of the Southern Historical Society Jubal A. Early. Early, a man who valued history as evidence from his frequent references of old stories, regarded the Confederacy as the greatest struggle for self-government and heroism of all time. Early believed so strongly in the Union’s wrongdoing that he called for retribution on the North. Early believed that the Southern rights had been violated and he continued to call for …show more content…
In his speech delivered at Union Square in New York City, Douglass posited that the Confederacy was not the right side of the war. He noted the dangers of the South repeating the same mistakes in the past by saying “Though the portents upon our national horizon are dark and sinister… Now, as then, the same rebellious spirit is much disturbed by the Army and the Navy.” Douglass explained that the Civil War was not fought solely on race, but on differing ideas, and the denial of all rights except the right of the strongest. In his speech, Douglass clearly laid out that the Confederacy was treasonous and wrong to separate from the Union and to maintain a practice such as