French Political Leadership: Franco-Prussian War

Words: 828
Pages: 4

French political leadership was so concerned about conflict because of a series of crisis after the Franco-Prussian War and the outcome of Germany being divided. After Napoleon III was defeated by the invasion of Prussia, many people in France questioned the political leadership. The people could not trust Napoleon III to be king again after being captured. The result of this made different political parties to compete for power. The final decision was that France be ruled by the Third Republic. When Germany was divided, France saw a rise in new technologies and decided to follow that. Although France wanted to be divided into different territories, they did not want a larger country taking over them by each subdivision. This is why France …show more content…
When the British first sent convicted criminals to Australia, they wanted to build a penal colony because England's prisons were running ut of room. As the British began colonizing, the once inhabited Aborigines of Australia were being wiped out by European diseases. As the settlement grew, colonists usually killed or displaced many Aborigines. The British also did not give many rights to the natives as they excluded them from their democracy. When the British founded New Zealand, they recognized the land rights of the Maori. At first, the British sent missionaries to convert the Maori to Christianity. As more and more British settlers arrived in New Zealand, there was repeated conflict with the Maori. Later on, the colonial government fought the Maori in a numerous amount of wars. The Maori's population decreased heavily from European diseases and they were outgunned by the British. The Maori were then driven into a remote part of that country. The native people in North America were treated fairly because they let the natives work with them for resources. Although at first the British thought the natives as heathens, they found how useful they were to work for them. England made a lot of money from the colonies in North America so they wanted more resources from there. The Bristish colonists supervised the natives so that they …show more content…
government could not enforce it was to keep European countries out of the war and free slaves. Countries like Britain and France relied on slavery to do all their dirty work for them. They wanted the South to win against the Union so that slavery could continue. When the North declared to free slaves, the European countries realized that their people would not allow them to support the South. This means they could not even send supplies or money to help the South defeat the North. The states that made up the Union stated that all slaves were free in that territory. As the Union won more territories from the South, they made sure that they freed all the slaves that were inhabited there. This increased the support of freed slaves in the battles. Most slaves that were free fought in the Union because they wanted to help the slaves in the South have a better life. This changed the style of how the Union fought because more and more people knew the cause in which they were fighting for. Although the U.S. government could not enforce the Emancipation Proclamation, the idea of freeing slaves impacted which side they were