Futile Pursuit Of Happiness Analysis

Words: 1040
Pages: 5

Tim O’Brien’s definition of “How to tell a true war story” contains factors relative to Tom Gertner’s The Futile Pursuit of Happiness. Whether right or wrong, truth or lie, correction or error; underneath every controversy, there will always be a requirement of explanation for its relevance. O’Brien’s explanation of conducting a true war story visibly distinguishes what happened to what seemed to happen. Gertner’s theory based on two professors are broken to analyze the theory of predicting the future, and to be of right or wrong for assumption. The amount of personal feelings involved periodically as well as eventfully,can result into a superstition. If Gertner states this originally: “How we forecast our feelings, and whether those predictions …show more content…
And if it’s difficult to figure out what makes us happy in the moment, how can we predict what will make us happy in the future?” The almighty brilliancy imagined with such feelings resembles truthfully, Jon Gertner’s, The Futile Pursuit of Happiness. Does Tim O’Brien also feel the same way? Does he show a sense of happiness with speaking of past occurrences instead of neglecting their entire existence? “I should have stepped in; fourth grade is no excuse. Besides it doesn’t get easier with time, and twelve years later, when Vietnam presented much harder choices, some practice at being brave might’ve helped.” (O’Brien 234). As Jon Gertner attempts to navigate present thoughts to venture future observations and those excitations to the current phenomenon. But according to the page 234 quote; O’Brien uses past conceptions to focus on the destiny he unwillingly unnoticed twelve years before, to directly understand and endeavor the sensation to how he feels today. Jon Gertner infers the following, “For example, how do we suppose we’ll feel our favorite college football team wins or loses, and then how do we really feel a few days after the game?” Is it impossible to NOT have a feeling