Gay Marriage Policy

Words: 835
Pages: 4

This content analysis is on LGBTQIA+ policy, specifically same sex marriage in the United States. I am focusing on what has happened since it was passed, focusing further on court cases, how our politics and effect other countries, and how different religious groups treat the issue. Same sex marriage is defined as marriage between two people of the same sex. In June of 2015 the US Supreme Court ruled that same sex couples could now marry nation wide, overturning some states laws against the act, and backing up some states laws allowing it. Most of the dissenting arguments against same sex marriage cite moral or religious reasons, with Justice Scalia calling it, "threat to American democracy”. However, the right to marry does not automatically …show more content…
I began by using a Google search to locate general articles about same sex marriage, then looked within the first few archives from the news websites. I used the archives from CBS and The New York Times to gather most of my data. I also have a couple articles from NPR and CNN. The publish dates range form the day after same sex marriage was passed, June 26th, 2015, through September, 2017. The NPR and CNN articles mostly focus on general information about same sex marriage, while the NYTimes and CBS are mostly about various court cases involving same sex marriage. Many of the court cases involve conservative or religious state officials blocking the ability to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples, or refusing to issue any licences at all, because same sex marriage is against their personal …show more content…
The most common descriptors of those people are conservative and religious. In Article #8 County Clerk Kim davis, when asked by whose authority she was refusing to issue marriage licenses, she replied, “Under God’s authority.” (Blinder, Pérez Peña). In Article #1 it was a “coalition of religious and social conservatives” (Texas Supreme Court hears case challenging benefits) who brought suit against the ruling giving same sex couples the same benefits that straight couples did. One religious group, the Mormons, in a statement from Elder Oaks, said that religious freedom does not,“override every law and government action that could possibly be interpreted to infringe on institutional or personal religious freedom”(Healy). When the Chief Justice of the the Alabama Supreme Court issued an order stopping marriage licenses being issued to same sex couples the legal director of the Human Rights Campaign said that, “It’s about him and his personal beliefs at this point, rather than carrying out the rule of law.”(Blinder). Article #5 deals with Kim Davis’ trip to Romania where she spoke against the country allowing same sex