Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study

Words: 518
Pages: 3
Open Document
1. The substantive criminal law is the specific acts of punishment someone gets for committing a crime. Unlawful killing is when someone has been killed by another or an undisclosed person.
2. The Gideon v. Wainwright case is significant in the advancement of the rights of the accused because they can have a fair trial without being denied by their judge and people who aren’t able to afford a lawyer can get one. The case is also significant because they have a right to council. The case changed many states because there were times that attorneys slept during the trial and even drunk. Which shows that some people were given an attorney who isn’t reliable to work on their case.
3. The supreme court hardly ever regards punishment other than the death penalty. The supreme court reinforced it in the year 2003 by sentencing 25 years for someone who is convicted of three felonies.
4. Lethal injection should be considered impermissibly cruel and unusual punishment because according to the eighth amendment, the defendant has the right to be punished fairly and cannot be harsh or cruel. I think that it is a terrible decision for lethal injection because the defendant should serve time for their crime instead of being put to death.
5. Based on my research, two decades is extremely too long to be on death row. Prisoners are …show more content…
Double jeopardy means that someone cannot be charged more than one for the same crime. However, if the same crime was committed then they would be charged again only if it was in a different state. Double jeopardy isn’t violated because civil court is two totally different courts. A civil court deals with noncriminal cases so therefore it wouldn’t be violated and criminal court is to try and punish a person against criminal law. Yes there is a case where double jeopardy occurred which is the Benton v.Maryland case. It would be very dangerous to know as a defendant because you could be innocent in one case and guilty in
Show More

Related Documents: Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study

Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study

In the case of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), Clarence Gideon in 1961 was arrested for burglary at the Bay Harbor Pool Hall in Panama City, Florida, due to accusation of an eye witness. Mr. Gideon was seen in court and asked for counsel to represent him because he could not afford an attorney but the court denied him due to Florida law/status that counsel is only appointed in Capital cases. Gideon was found guilty and sentence to five years in prison. With the only use of the prison library…

Words 173 - Pages 1

Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study

Gideon v. Wainwright Garland Casey McClure Southwest Tennessee Community College Gideon v. Wainwright The challenge in this case is based on requests being made by the accused, that a counsel be appointed to him. “If the accused is indigent, it is the duty of the State to acknowledge that request and to appoint counsel for the purpose of assisting the accused in the trial of the case.” (Educational Broadcasting, 2006) The Case “Clarence Earl Gideon was convicted by the State of Florida for the…

Words 575 - Pages 3

5 soical issues Essay

power without paying the costs related with covering those protections across the board to minorities and the poor. It is imperative for our students to understand the laws that protect their basic rights as citizens, or it can be misused and in some cases taken away. "Equal justice" means a justice administered in the same way based on the earlier settled law in the Country, or what is called the precedent prevailing. Therefore, no Citizen can be discriminated in the same set of circumstances. Our…

Words 1438 - Pages 6