Greece Vs Mesopotamia

Words: 1869
Pages: 8

History has changed the way people live and interact with each other within an area. There have been various successful regions that share similarities and differences that have led to their triumph. The Mesopotamian River Valley flourished in the Middle East in 3200-2350 BCE. Following, the Greek Empire came to prosperity in the Mediterranean Region in 750-338 BCE. Years later Aksum thrived on the horn of Africa in 100-750 CE. Being able to flourish throughout these societies lead back to their challenges and advantages they faced in their area, expressing that geography is the mother of all nature. Although Mesopotamia faced many difficulties, the River Valley grew strong due to the Euphrates and Tigris River, which gave them good soil. …show more content…
The rugged mountains in Ancient Greece made unification difficult and created a division between city-states, unlike Mesopotamia who did not have enough separation. 1 The mountains restricted the city-states from communicating with one another as well as trading with each other. Thus, the city-states were unable to bond which restricted them from helping each other with internal struggles such as war. Several of the rugged mountains would take days or weeks to climb until they reached another city-state, so many people decided life was better if they stayed where they were. This also prevented them from trading with the other city-states. During some of the wars that began in the ocean, city-states could not get help from other areas because there was no way to get in contact with them which meant that they had so fight on their own. The rugged land made farming a challenge because the crops were not suitable for the rocky land. All of these mountains made trade, transportation, communication, and farming a challenge. Another geographic feature that greatly affect Greece was farming. Greeks faced great challenges while farming. 2 The people in Greece could not farm since most of the land was unsuitable for farming or could not handle the climate, which meant they had to trade the resources they had to get food and other needs in return. In Mesopotamia they faced a similar challenge of …show more content…
Aksum had access to numerous waterways which made trade easier. 1 These waterways included, the Red Sea, the Indian Ocean, Mediterranean Sea, the Blue Nile, and White Nile. All of these waterways were connected to many other places around the world including, Rome, Arabia, India, Meroe, Persia, and Egypt. Aksum was easy to access, so with the help of these waterways people began to trade with them. In both Mesopotamia and Greece they had to trade as well to get resources that they needed. Aksum later on became an international trading power where people from many parts of the world came to trade resources and ideas. Aksum was such a popular place to trade and managed to influence the Mediterranean Sea and the Indian Ocean. Not only did the waterways help Aksum thrive but their natural resources did as well. Aksum had various natural resources that attracted others. 2 This included, gold, diamonds, and natural oil and gas. Many of these natural resources were uncommon in other parts of the world so several people came to Aksum to find them. In 2008 Aksum had 22% of the world's gold and 55% of the world's diamonds. In Africa, the resources are very undistributed, meaning that resources can only be found in certain areas. Aksum was one of the places that had a great number of resources while other places in Africa lacked many natural resources. Since Aksum had a great amount of natural