Hambrick Talent

Words: 1076
Pages: 5

In a world of competition and rivalry, one needs all they can get to have an edge over their opposition but the most vital advantage one can get may just be hidden inside of them all this time. It’s the factor that separates us all in terms of ability to perform certain tasks and it’s known as talent. You originally may have thought hard work was the most definite path to success but studies and multiple real-life examples disagree with this. I believe Hambrick is correct in his assumption, talent trumps hard work due to the fact that the talented person has to put in less effort to see more success and is often able to reach higher altitudes due to their innate ability. Talent provides one with an easier path to success due to their natural …show more content…
I have experienced this first hand in my life in school and swimming. My close friend, who’s a senior, works extremely hard in swimming striving to improve in any way he can and stay in the best shape as possible so he can win. He’s very successful and one of the best swimmers I know due to all of his hardwork and determination. Another friend of mine, a freshman, is extremely talented but lacks the effort of my senior friend. Nonetheless he is already faster than my senior friend having broken a few records and on the verge of more. They both practice together and know who works harder (by a large margin too) but my freshman friend continues to find more success than my senior friend regardless of effort. “Nor is it to say that it’s impossible for a person with an average I.Q. to, say, earn a Ph.D. in physics. It’s just unlikely, relatively speaking.” (Hambrick and Meinz). At a certain point one will need innate talent to reach extreme success such as a Ph.D. It isn’t impossible for an average person to reach these things but in a competitive sport or game it would be. The combination of hard work and extreme talent would be nearly impossible to beat especially if you lacked the talent. Such a professional gaming (video games)- everyone works hard but certain players are just …show more content…
Yes most of the time, but then it’s not a true competition- talent and hardwork are compared when there is at least some kind of drive to become more successful and improve. Otherwise there is no reason to compare the two but when they are compared, like my swimming friends (both having a small drive to win), talent seems to trump hard work. In my Physics C class, there are people that work extremely hard but can not get above a B while some people do not study at all and get A’s. Certain tasks you can get away with not working and succeeding while people who work hard fail- such as school. Some are just poor test takers while other struggle to understand and grasp concepts so there’s also other variables that play into