Hammurabi Vs Crone

Words: 621
Pages: 3

The two main limitations Patricia Crone presence of pre-industrial societies were organization and the lack of agriculture. These two factors were similar throughout all pre-industrial societies. Dealing with the agricultural limits in a land where food scarcely caused problems for many. Those without wealth struggled immensely. The Lack of organization caused the control of agriculture to plummet even more. During this time Hammurabi’s code of Laws, which was a strict form of practice and became necessary for survival.
From the beginning, the use of Hammurabi’s code of Law and Crone’s analogy of pre-industrial society helped guide the way for some type of organization towards the middle ages. To put it simply, Hammurabi’s code of Law was the basis of some sort of organization which influenced the later ideas of law. This code was also a way to compare crones’ ideas on how pre-Industrial society should play out in order for it to have any type of success.
…show more content…
That way that one person would be able to manage what would be going on. This idea would be plausible for a period of time but one would have to understand, it can’t all be done alone. As time passed crones model began to differ. An example would be around the time of Charlemagne’s rule. Charlemagne was someone who thought highly of education and religion. He was able to show, that by giving his followers an in-depth education of the law everyone would be on the same page and become understanding of his rule (lecture 8). He was not one to care for only himself and earned an even greater form of respect from his followers. In return for his loyalty to the people, he was able to grow even more in power. This complete contradicts what crones model