Compare And Contrast The Roman Empire And The Han Empire

Submitted By brettfeldman38
Words: 722
Pages: 3
Open Document
Brett Feldman 9/17/13 Mr. Gribble 8th period

These two empires were both extremely well established and maintained a structured political system. The Roman Empire, which lasted from 753 B.C. to 600 C.E. and the Han Empire, which lasted from 202 B.C. to 220 C.E., were both extremely powerful empires in their times and had had many similarities in the way they grew and developed but differed in the way they maintained their economic patterns and their declines.

The city of Rome was founded by Romulus in 753 B.C.E. The growth of the empire was a slow and gradual process but began picking up momentum in the third and second centuries B.C.E. when they began invading and conquering larger amounts of land. This heavily relates to the growth of the Han Empire. They both gained land by attacking and conquering their neighbors. A large difference is the reason why they were trying to gain so much land and power. The Roman Empires growth is mainly thanks to the two leading consuls. The main force behind invading others land was greed and the two consuls desire to prove their military glory in their short 1-year reign. The Han invaded land not mainly because of greed, the emperor at the time, Wu, had a very specific mission for gaining land. The Xiongnu was a military threat to the Han and Wu needed soldiers and horses to fight them. He invaded much of the land around him to gain soldiers and horses for his cavalry. These two empires similarly gained military strength through their conquests as well, the Romans from Italy and the Han in Vietnam. In both instances the military was used but for highly different reasons.

The main economic patterns for both Rome and the Han revolved around agriculture. They both used agriculture to feed their people and trade with surrounding regions for other necessary goods. The peasant class was a vital portion in both the Han and the Roman empires for it was they who did the majority of the farming. A major difference is the pace at which the two economies grew. The Roman Empire planted grapes and barely, which were very valuable for trade. The Han came to power following a civil war and therefore had to grow their economy at a much slower rate. Both empires traded with other regions but the Han Empire had a much broader range of trade because of the Silk Road. The Silk Road ran all throughout Asia and allowed the Han to trade silk and other goods, which helped grow their economy. The Romans didn’t have access to anything of that nature.

One of the biggest differences between the two empires is the
Show More

Related Documents: Compare And Contrast The Roman Empire And The Han Empire

Essay on Rome and Han

Religion and philosophy have helped shape cultures and people throughout history. Rome and China are two of the most prominent examples of how religion and philosophy can help develop an entire empire. Religion and philosophy helped Rome and China form better political and societal structures, and it helped Rome's people behave due to the moral obligations that came with Christianity's Ten Commandments. Qin China's emperor, Shi Huangdi, suppressed Confucianism and Daoism in favor of Legalism…

Words 495 - Pages 2

Rome and Han Comparison Essay

Similarities between Rome and Han ▪ Develop from regional into “world powers” ▪ Cost of defending borders which stretch 1000 of miles ultimately hastens downfall ▪ Urban empires based on surplus from agriculture ▪ Technological achievements include hydraulic engineering: Rome aqueducts Chinese canals. Networks of roads & other forms of transport unify empires. ▪ Families headed by patriarchs provide cohesion ▪ Agriculture main economic activity. Get power by breaking…

Words 749 - Pages 3

Essay on Han and Rome DBQ

Han and Rome DBQ Han and Roman attitudes towards technology both changed over time for the better. The Han attitude toward manufacturing and labor of technology was more open and positive than the Romans, which had a more organized and class divided society. Documents 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 8 are all from government officials’ points of view. Documents 3 and 7 are from a philosopher’s point of view. In short, in the documents 1, 2, 3, and 4, the Han people share attitudes in advancement in technology…

Words 846 - Pages 4

han vs rome Essay

Austin Kittrell Han vs Rome The choice of which society I would rather be a merchant in is quite obviously the Roman Empire for a variety of reasons. First the Roman Empire had much more developed trade networks than the Han Dynasty. Although the Han Dynasty had better written communication it lacked the vastness of influence the Roman Empire held. Additionally, the Han Dynasty only had Southern Asia and Eastern Asia while the Roman Empire’s realm spread over a much larger area. This led to a greater…

Words 408 - Pages 2

The Weaknesses Of Rome And Han China

the prevalent Former Han line was supplanted by the privileged, overwhelmed later Han administration in the first century A.D. Both later empires needed to depend progressively on savage troops to police the brute outskirts, in light of the fact that the class of autonomous agriculturist fighters had practically vanished. .…

Words 268 - Pages 2

Rome and Han Essay

Comparative Essays in a Nutshell Comparative Essays have a VERY specific format that MUST be followed in order to achieve the most points possible. Below I have outlined the comparative essay so that you can write this essay to the best of your ability. Paragraph 1: Thesis The Thesis is one sentence that not only says what the paper is about, but in what order you are going to write it. The thesis statement must start with ALTHOUGH or EVENTHOUGH. The thesis must be a 2:1 or a 1:2 ratio. You…

Words 779 - Pages 4

Rome And Han China Comparative Essay

Han China from 206 BCE to 220 CE and Imperial Rome from 31 BCE to 476 CE were both large and powerful empires during the classical period. These two empires share many similarities and differences between political control. There are several ways that Han China and Imperial Rome are connected, but their methods of becoming two of the most powerful empires of their time, shows ways in which they are divided as well. The Han dynasty of China and Imperial Rome’s methods of political control were very…

Words 504 - Pages 3

Compare And Contrast Rome And Han China

James Pritchard 7th 10/9/14 The Roman Empire Vs. Han China Politically, Economically, and Socially The Roman Empire was Dominate Empire in Europe and North Africa, meanwhile, to the east another civilization was just as powerful, the Han dynasty. The two were similar in many ways, but just as different in others. There Political systems of Rome had 2 consoles a year, while China had Emperors. The social system of China and Rome was that the basic unit of society was family. The economical factor…

Words 491 - Pages 2

Similarities Between Rome And Han China

different methods used for political control. Han dynasty of China and Imperial Rome in the classical period had many similarities and differences of the methods used for political control. The similarities include the methods used to keep order in the society and the people who had the political control of the empire. The differences include the methods the rulers used to gain the trust and favor of the people. One of the significant similarity between the Han dynasty and the Roman empire is that they…

Words 345 - Pages 2

Brown: Han Dynasty and Rome Essay

Han vs. Rome Tim Travis AP World Period 7 September 29, 2013 The Han and the Rome empires were very different in their political systems. Both differed in the way they handled their borders, the way they looked at society, and religion. These two dynasties were different when it came their borders, as well as government. Rome and Han had their similarities as well. Both were similar in agriculture, and in their government. With these two empires having their differences and similarities…

Words 729 - Pages 3