Hate Crime Argumentative Essay

Words: 656
Pages: 3

The Constitutional law and the criminal justice system are very argumentative subjects. So here is a very argumentative question, why do police officers shoot even when the victims are unarmed? Hate crimes are the reason for many of shootings. A hate crime is generally understood to mean a crime against a victim who is chosen specifically because of a person's race, religion, gender, nationality, disability, and in some states sexual orientation. In 1990 congress passed an act known as the statistics act, which required the department of the justice to collect and publish statistics about crimes that seem to be bias-related. In many states hate crime laws do not include sexual orientation as a protected class. People that support hate crime legislation engage that laws are necessary to reinforce society's message that prejudice and hate are not acceptable. Hate crimes committed by police officers not only Walden3 injure the victim and their families but can also have an impact on the community and sometimes the nation as well. Supporters of hate crime legislation also engage that not only crimes but hate crimes cause the victim a lot of physical and psychological harm than different types of other crime so the punishment should be more. However, others argue that enhancing …show more content…
Statistics came in and 11,200 law enforcement agencies participated in the data-collection program, the agencies reported a little over 8,000 hate crime incidents. That is about one hate crime per hour. Violent acts motivated by racial or ethnic people, or groups are crimes because congress has the constitutional authority to regulate those variety of acts. In prosecuting crimes the states have played in, the bill is also mindful of the tradition. Local and state officials investigate and prosecute the very great majority of the hate crimes that occur in their towns and communities and would continue to do so if this bill would have been