Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
I, Kathleen, write this opinion to (support the majority opinion or dissent with the majority opinion) on the case of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier.
I greatly agree with the majority because the newspaper was sponsored within the school. The school has the right to remove pages and decides what can go into it, if they sponser it they have the right to decide whats good and whats bad. It could matter up to many things what was wrong, such as offensive or harsh things for the students to view. It was best for the students it have been removed.
I favored loose interpretation because even if the students have rights, its best that sometimes for those to be restricted because it can help prevent rash things in a situation from starting. I believe that the school used the restrictions correctly to protect their rights and in best interest of the majority. I agree that the school…show more content… v. State of Florida
I,Kathleen, write this opinion to (support the majority opinion or dissent with the majority opinion) on the case of T.M. v. State of Florida.
My opinion reflects on the majority because the curfew that the town has is harsh. I don't think passing laws for behavior will be the way to help, because it didn't target the activites that would lead to crime. It doesn't only affect minors but also parents. The majority opinion was a good decision therefor.
I favor strict interpretation for this case, I think freedom of assembly is a right that needs more attention. And it's important to citizens. They should all have equal right however parents should have jurisdiction over their children. There shouldn't be a set curfew because it violates individual rights. I think parents should have authority over their child.
The first admendment is important to my decision because a minor should have the right to go to public places without being punished for curfew. It's not right for citizens to be punished for actions of criminals, and seems very
