Henrietta Lacks Case Study

Words: 452
Pages: 2

From the 1950s to the present day medicine has been advancing at an exponential rate. Most of the medical breakthroughs can be attributed to one lady, Henrietta Lacks. Henrietta Lacks’s cancer cells were the first immortalized cell line. This meant scientist could reproduce and sustain human cells outside of a body. Although many people see this as a victory for man kind others notice the ethical problems that arise from harvesting cells from a deceased women. Questions like is she still living? Was it right to use her cells without permission? As medicine advances more and more questions like these appear, due to the conflict of beliefs between the church and science. However, there will come a point when the needs and improvement of humanity are put above the privacies and concerns of individuals. In the Henrietta Lacks case her five children – who barley even knew their mother due to her young death – didn’t even know their mother’s cells were being replicated and reproduced in science experiments. The youngest of the five children (Debrah) took the initiative in discovering her mother’s cells. Through the help of Julian Salvelescu Debrah learned that her mother helped create vaccines such as the polio vaccines and that her …show more content…
In the case of medicine, there must be humans that donate their bodies and or cells to enhance the field of medicine. Even though Henrietta Lacks didn’t donate her tumor cells to science, her cells benefitted all of humanity. Henrietta Lacks situation solidifies the fact that there comes a point when the benefits to humanity out weigh the privacy and decision making of the individual. If Henrietta denied access to her cells humanity wouldn’t have a polio vaccine, wouldn’t know if it was safe for humans to fly in space, and wouldn’t understand how different viruses infect cells. There is no doubt that without Henrietta’s cells the humanity we know would be