History Of The US Patriot Act

Submitted By skylar120
Words: 2887
Pages: 12

The making and history of the U.S Patriot Act involved many parties who opposed and supported the legislation. It was proposed and signed into the law by George W. Bush. Within 45 days after the September 11, terrorist attack of New York in 2001. Its goals are to strengthen domestic security and broaden the powers of Law Enforcement with regards of stopping and identifying terrorist. The passing and renewal of the Patriotic Act has been controversial. Supporters claim that it has been instrumental in numbers if investigations and terrorist attacks. Title 2 section broadens the ability of Law-Enforcement to conduct surveillance on “agents of foreign powers.” It allows the interception of communications if they're related to terrorist activities and allows law-enforcement agencies to share information related to terrorist activities with federal authorities. The act provides Law-Enforcement officials with greater authority to monitor Internet activity, such as email and web-site visits. While Law-Enforcement officials enable their new authorities helping them to better track terrorist and other criminal activity. Title 3 caused to expand wiretap authority over electronic communications. While Title 3 of the Patriot Act may very well be valuable in the prevention of identity theft and other financial related crimes, it appears unlikely that the act would significantly aid law enforcement in evading another September 11 type of an attack. Title 3 is also an effective measure to grandiose money laundering schemes; the act misses the mark in relation to anti-terrorism financing. Title 5 Border Security, amends the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 to give more law enforcement and investigative power to the United States Attorney General and to the Immigration and Naturalization Service. The Act amended the INA to add new provisions enforcing mandatory detention laws. On May 26, 2011 Barack Obama signed The Patriots Sunsets Act of 2011 which was a four-year extension of three key provisions in the USA Patriot Act. These provisions were made without making much-needed changes to the surveillance bill. The extended provisions are set now set to expire on June 1, 2015. Despite bills pending in both the House and the Senate to amend the three expiring provisions and other sections of the Patriot Act, Congress decided instead to move ahead with reauthorization.

1. https://www.aclu.org/reform-patriot-act
2. http://www.howstuffworks.com/patriot-act.htm
3. http://www.justice.gov/archive/ll/highlights.htm
The making and history of the U.S Patriot Act involved many parties who opposed and supported the legislation. It was proposed and signed into the law by George W. Bush. Within 45 days after the September 11, terrorist attack of New York in 2001. Its goals are to strengthen domestic security and broaden the powers of Law Enforcement with regards of stopping and identifying terrorist. The passing and renewal of the Patriotic Act has been controversial. Supporters claim that it has been instrumental in numbers if investigations and terrorist attacks. Title 2 section broadens the ability of Law-Enforcement to conduct surveillance on “agents of foreign powers.” It allows the interception of communications if they're related to terrorist activities and allows law-enforcement agencies to share information related to terrorist activities with federal authorities. The act provides Law-Enforcement officials with greater authority to monitor Internet activity, such as email and web-site visits. While Law-Enforcement officials enable their new authorities helping them to better track terrorist and other criminal activity. Title 3 caused to expand wiretap authority over electronic communications. While Title 3 of the Patriot Act may very well be valuable in the prevention of identity theft and other financial related crimes, it appears unlikely that the act would significantly aid law enforcement in evading another September 11 type of an