Essay about Hobbes and State of Nature

Submitted By kika_93
Words: 626
Pages: 3
Open Document
Sovereignty is the quality of having an independent authority over a geographic area. In order to create an absolute sovereign power you have to reach order and peace. It is important to understand the nature behind humans in Hobbes point of view, he views humans as machines and imagines the world in a mechanistic way. Which is where he differs from Aristotle on how involved the citizen should be involved with politics, and the influence that nature has on humans. Our sensory experience is influenced by physical and emotional characteristics, we can have the same object but two different people can have different emotions towards it. This is due to the experience that each individual has with the object, he gives examples of humans understanding how objects can’t move themselves unless something else moves it, humans have no difficulty understanding that however, yet we find it hard and make exceptions for humans Hobbes whoever believes that the same rule implies to us(Hobbes 7) giving us sense impressions. What makes us different from other animals is due to the fact that we have and use speech to communicate, but also to record and exchange knowledge (Hobbes 20). He understands that natural violence exists and human disagreement is a natural instinct, because humans tend to defend themselves when they feel their life being threatened, which is why it is necessary to have an absolute sovereignty. In order for them to set out rules for men that want the same thing, yet both cant have it, making us equal to one another.
By having equality of condition we reach absolute sovereign power, and you will not only have a unify group of humans but a rather calm and just one. The representor receives his power because as humans we look to it to solve our problems and by doing that we are accepting that it’s the power. Liberty is achieved when we leave each other alone and not going around and saying what’s good or bad(Hobbes138). Hobbes believes that the only ones responsible for change are the politicians and rulers, and that is how we achieve liberty. The separation or division of powers will only destroy each other (Hobbes 213) since they will all try to gain more power over the other, in addition Hobbes also does not agree that the rulers power should be limited by a constitution between the sovereign and the people, since the objective of the sovereign power is for the state to be secure and do what
Hobbes strongly believed that the less people in a political power the better. Ideally it
Show More

Related Documents: Essay about Hobbes and State of Nature

Thomas Hobbes State Of Nature

Thomas Hobbes claims that in a state of nature, people are constantly fighting against each other, and the only way to overcome this is to form a commonwealth. He does this by going over the conditions that describe a state of nature, certain rights that all people have in nature, and the method for transferring these rights, by way of a pledge to a sovereign, whether it to the one person, or a group of people in order to achieve a state of peace. While Hobbes makes a very clear argument, it does…

Words 1320 - Pages 6

Essay Compare And Contrast Hobbes And Locke S Accounts Of The State Of Nature

Compare and contrast Hobbes´ and Locke´s accounts of the state of nature The state of nature is the idea of a life without laws, without government and without a state. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, two of the most important philosophers of the 17th century, had different conceptions of this state. Even though both philosophers agree on the dangers within a state of nature and the equality that men had in this state, their theories differ. When it comes to the state of war, Hobbes is much more pessimistic…

Words 1054 - Pages 5

How Did John Locke's Influence On Government

The object of this essay is to compare and contrast Thomas Hobbes and John Locke’s ideas in the state of nature and how it has an influence on government. Both Hobbes and Locke write similar when referring to the state of nature, they raise the idea that man can exist without government, but that it comes with risks. Hobbes speaks of the nature itself, while Locke makes examples to prove it. The Leviathan and Second Treatise of Government help explain Hobbes’s and Locke’s ideas and the points they…

Words 1513 - Pages 7

Hobbes Vs Locke

One of Hobbes’ take-away claims from “Leviathan” is that absolute monarchy is preferable to the State of Nature. Locke, in stating that the State of Nature is superior to absolute monarchy, is in direct opposition to Hobbes’ claim. As such, this explicit and direct opposition to Hobbes’ claim could easily be construed an intentional response to Hobbes. The difference in the claims originates in the difference between each author’s conception of the State of Nature. Where Hobbes imagines the State…

Words 298 - Pages 2

Essay on Help on Homewrok

The Materialist View of Human Nature Hobbes believed that all phenomena in the universe, without exception, can be explained in terms of the motions and interactions of material bodies. He did not believe in the soul, or in the mind as separate from the body, or in any of the other incorporeal and metaphysical entities in which other writers have believed. Instead, he saw human beings as essentially machines, with even their thoughts and emotions operating according to physical laws and chains of…

Words 1197 - Pages 5

Thomas Vs Hobbes

Thomas Hobbes’s dilemma of the state of nature is that of a society of no government, no police, no courts, no laws, and no central authority. if humans were left to themselves without government, Hobbes claims, then life would be horrible, nasty and brutish. Hobbes implies that human beings are essentially selfish and without government human beings would hurt and kill each other without hesitation. According to Hobbes, people agree to be moral and not to hurt others only if they negotiate with…

Words 791 - Pages 4

Hobbes Government

Hobbes' theory of government is set out in Leviathan (1651). Hobbes challenged the two predominant views of governmental authority. One held that the authority of kings derived from God (Divine Right) and that a king's power should be absolute, as it came from God. The other held that government existed for the benefit of the people and derived authority from that. Hobbes began his argument with his pessimistic theory of human nature. He thought that people were by nature greedy and selfish, and…

Words 419 - Pages 2

Essay on Hobbes vs. Smith

Social Order Creation: Hobbes vs. Smith Hobbes and Smith are at odds about the idea of how power plays into social order creation. Hobbes believes that in the state of nature, man has no power to control others, and because of this, everyone is aggressive towards one another, as no one can trust another. Because of this, social order is necessary to give man incentive towards cooperation and trust, by selling your individual rights to freedom in order to gain social rights of security and safety…

Words 3179 - Pages 13

John Locke Vs Hobbes

most individuals would agree that it is the investigation of the nature, causes or principles of reality, values or knowledge rooted in a reasoning approach. Moreover, philosophers provide inside into the mysteries of human existence and truth. Two well-known philosophers, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, do exactly this by discussing elements of the social contract, a theory from the Age of Enlightenment that addresses the nature of man, the origin of society and political authority over man. In…

Words 1803 - Pages 8

Hobbes and Leviathan Essay

Thomas Hobbes offers what was then a radically novel conception of the origins of civil government. Hobbes’ ideas of the commonwealth are predicated upon his views of human nature and the state of mankind without government, and so he establishes his position on these concepts before addressing the commonwealth’s creation. First Hobbes writes of the natural condition of human beings, which he believes is inherently troublesome; the state of nature that exists without a government, which to Hobbes is…

Words 2472 - Pages 10