Hobbes Vs Machiavelli Essay

Words: 1224
Pages: 5

Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes both had different takes on how society,its people, and politics should be handled. While Machiavelli wrote contradictory theories on his literal works, Hobbes was more assuring, but mostly their works seem to have laid the foundation of modern philosophy. In their respective books The Prince and Thomas Hobbes Leviathan their views on society, nature and government can help further balance their individual brilliance and school of thoughts on politics which are more pronounced today by most governments and the societies where the human concept and reasoning on various topics seems to be self-centered in a narcissistic manner. Hobbes precisely foresaw the metamorphosis of human nature which is mostly “directed …show more content…
Machiavelli wrote his books when the states were usually led by monarch system of “the ruling which made the states more secure and predictable because there was an established system under which the states would fit into”The other dominant factor which influenced his work was the Roman Catholic Church which had a lot of influence on the leaders and the Christians who followed their doctrine. In support of the rule of law which was present during that time, Machiavelli created the morality and the immoral concept which determined how people were going to b led while following a certain rule of law. Hobbes who came from a humble background usually based his work on how different social classes made people behave regarding their politics, nature, and involvement of society. While he sees negative aspects in most people, the reasoning could have been as a result of kingdom wars and overthrow of dynasties. Hobbes “movements and proximity to power meant that he could easily be mistaken as being ruling elite whereas most of his work was on the scholarly level” This influenced his work because most of the dynasty nobles who were ruling during his tenure in their realm were later executed during the overthrowing of King Charles II whom he