Hobbes Vs Rousseau Analysis

Words: 219
Pages: 1
Open Document
Unlike Rousseau, Hobbes states that if any two men desire the same thing, which only one can have, they turn against each other. This means that people need a common power or need a government to keep them in check. If people fight with each other, the only thing that can stop them is the government or another source of power. To add on, he also mentions that distrust causes people to live in fear and insecurity. As conveyed in his writing, if anyone doubts humans aren’t at war with each other or live in dread and concern, people should check if they do anything of things listed. Hobbes strengthens his argument by adding, “...when taking a journey, he arms himself and travels with companions; when sleeping, he locks his doors; when in his
Show More

Related Documents: Hobbes Vs Rousseau Analysis

A Discussion Upon the Vying Perceived Importance of Soverign Rights Versus Human Rights Essay

modern concept of sovereignty came about after the Social Theory postulations of Thomas Hobbes in his work Leviathan. Hobbes argued that the Sovereignty of a ruler is provided by way of a Contract between himself and his people, a trade of some of their rights in exchange for the Sovereign power to maintain their safety. Various other philosophers have expounded upon Hobbes’ notion of Sovereignty, such as Locke, Rousseau and Austin, however the Peace Treaties of Westphalia of 1648 provide the first practical…

Words 2704 - Pages 11

Sociology Essay

human freedom has not been fully realized Durkheim, Marx & Weber on the setback of freedom in modern society - each theorists believe that human freedom was being undermined through the social processes that could be understood through their analysis Durkheim - Individual freedom; organic social whole; morality - concerned less about freedom about the negative social effects of individuals into the social organism - strange notion of freedom - begins from social organism, individual has…

Words 2792 - Pages 12