Socrates to see Euthypho in front of the court, and conversation together. Socrates listened to the charges from Meletus about making the youth change from being corrupted. Euthypho prosecuted his father because the father murder employee to death. This is the beginning of the conversation to find out what is holy, and what is unholy. Allegations that Socrates making the youth are being corrupted and creates a new God is unholy. And Euthypho prosecuted his father is unholy, too. Even the family said that prosecution his father is unholy.
I agree with Socrates, because he was observant and trying to learn and find the answers in the unknown and asked for finding a definition of one thing, and start the definition of general acceptability and make the meaning of the definition clearly.…show more content… Although who would be the father, mother or relative of you, which they did wrong. But you did not prosecuted of law, then you were wrong! In the case of Euthypho's father was arrested employee by binding his hands and feet to stay outside because he killed people. At that time, send one man to Athens for decision to punish employee, and the employee died of hunger and cold because Euthypho's father disregarded him because he was a murder. This like killing indirectly, although did not shoot or beaten, but it was tortured to death. There many people would not agree with the person prosecuted their parents, because they would be ungrateful and it was unholy for child to prosecute parents for murder or did other
